GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Max Verstappen’s sarcastic message censored despite no foul language | F1 Saudi Arabian GP

Max Verstappen’s sarcastic message censored despite no foul language | F1 Saudi Arabian GP. FOM bleeped Max Verstappen’s radio for sarcasm, not swearing.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull 2025 F1

Max Verstappen always at the center of discussion
The Formula 1 world continues to talk about what happened at the start of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, with the near contact between Oscar Piastri and Max Verstappen and the Dutchman’s corner-1 cut, for which he was later handed a five-second penalty for not giving the position back. The penalty essentially cost the Red Bull driver the win, as he crossed the line 2.6 seconds behind the Australian #81. After the race, all journalists asked Max Verstappen about the incident, but he refused to answer any questions, explaining in the press conference that he wanted “to save time and avoid getting in trouble.”

The controversial team radio
Perhaps a wise choice, especially in light of what has emerged regarding FOM’s handling of his team radio immediately following the penalty communication during the race. On television, the radio exchange between Lambiase and Verstappen was aired with a bleep, leading everyone to assume Verstappen had used a curse word. However, listening to the full recording of the exchange between the world champion and his race engineer reveals that this wasn’t the case. Verstappen simply seems to say, “really lovely,” sarcastically referring to the penalty.

Moreover, the FOM broadcast ended with Lambiase’s message, “no comment,” advising Max to avoid getting into trouble with harsh comments about the stewards. In reality, Verstappen responded further to this by saying, “oh don’t worry, I don’t care.” A message that shows the #1 from Hasselt had no intention of insulting anyone, but rather maintained a sarcastic tone regarding the penalty. Below is a comparison of the two ‘versions’ of the team radio, clearly showing the difference.

FOM Version
Lambiase: “Info: you’ve been given a five-second penalty for the turn-one incident. Head down.”
Verstappen: “Oh, it’s…”
Lambiase: “Yes, Max…”
Verstappen: “…[censored] lovely!”
Lambiase: “Yes. Yes. No comment.”

Full Version
Lambiase: “Gap behind 1.1. Info: you’ve been given a five-second penalty for the turn-one incident. Head down.”
Verstappen: “Oh, it’s…”
Lambiase: “Yes, Max…”
Verstappen: “…really lovely!”
Lambiase: “Yes. Yes. No comment.”
Verstappen: “Oh don’t worry, I don’t care.”
Lambiase: “Mode nine.”

An alternative interpretation is also circulating online, since Verstappen’s audio is not perfectly clear and Lambiase briefly speaks over him. This other version – shared for accuracy and completeness – suggests the Dutchman said “bloody lovely,” which would translate to something like “damn lovely” in Italian. Even in this case, however, it’s hard to understand the point of the bleep, as no actual curse or insult is present, though the expression is clearly more critical and provocative.

Preventive censorship or manufactured controversy?
This seems to be an episode of preventive censorship. It should be noted, though, that the communications broadcast on TV are delayed from real-time to be screened before airing. The concern – which would be quite serious – is that someone may have intentionally tried to manufacture a small media storm by exploiting Max Verstappen’s reputation, as he’s known for colorful radio messages. Yet he wasn’t on this occasion, even though a distorted impression was given.

Earlier this year, FOM had already been criticized, this time by Ferrari: after the Chinese GP, team principal Fred Vasseur strongly complained about how Lewis Hamilton’s team radio was aired. The Brit had spontaneously offered to give up position to teammate Charles Leclerc, but the omission of part of the conversation led viewers to believe the opposite — that the team had suggested the swap and Hamilton was stalling. We’ll see what Red Bull and Verstappen’s reactions will be this time.

Apr 23, 2025Mark Robinson
George Russell responds to Mercedes contract rumors: "Nothing discussed before May or June"Liam Lawson’s 10-second penalty stirs controversy after F1 Saudi Arabian GP
You Might Also Like
 
Max Verstappen masterpiece stint on softs: 29 laps within 0.5 seconds | Mexican GP
 
Isack Hadjar reveals clever mindset that could break Red Bull’s infamous second-seat curse

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Mark Robinson

Mark Robinson has been following Formula 1 since childhood and brings a wealth of knowledge about the sport's history and evolution

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP, Max Verstappen, Red BullMax Verstappen, Red Bull, Saudi Arabian GP22

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}