GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Liam Lawson’s 10-second penalty stirs controversy after F1 Saudi Arabian GP

Liam Lawson’s 10-second penalty stirs controversy after F1 Saudi Arabian GP. Lawson received a 10-second penalty in Jeddah for cutting Turn 1.

Liam Lawson, 2024

Disputable decision
The post-race discussion after the Saudi Arabian GP was dominated by the ‘Verstappen case’ and the debate over whether or not the penalty given to the Dutchman was justified, after he cut turn 1 and failed to yield position to Oscar Piastri, who eventually won the race thanks to the five-second penalty given to Max Verstappen. A similar infraction—penalized with a 10-second sanction due to the lack of the mitigating factor of it being the first lap—was committed, according to the stewards, by Liam Lawson when overtaking Jack Doohan’s Alpine.

What happened to the New Zealander received less attention, as his battle didn’t involve the front positions, but the penalty given to car #30 is stirring a lot of discussion online. The stewards’ decision in this case appears extremely harsh. In justifying it, the stewards wrote: “Although he completed the overtake before turn 1, the speed he reached in the corner prevented him from staying on track through turn 1. He therefore failed to successfully overtake car 7 without leaving the track, thereby gaining a lasting advantage which he did not relinquish. The standard 10-second penalty was therefore applied.”

Liam Lawson got a 10s time penalty cause of this incident….pic.twitter.com/kZpcORJDnB

— RBR Daily (@RBR_Daily) April 20, 2025

The stewards’ version
However, upon reviewing the footage, there are significant doubts about whether Lawson actually gained an advantage in this situation: Alpine car #7 completed the overtaking maneuver immediately after the start/finish line on the main straight, approached turn 1 with a clear margin, and then went slightly wide, putting his right wheels—and for a moment also the front left—outside the track limits, as seen in the onboard footage. Lawson, however, did not cut the corner but attempted to rejoin and complete it. In doing so, he slightly blocked Doohan, who was coming up behind.

It seems evident that the Racing Bulls driver was attempting to complete the corner properly, without deliberately going wide to gain an advantage. For this reason, the decision to penalize him seems excessively harsh—especially with the full penalty and without any mitigating factors. The 10-second addition to his race time cost Lawson one position: he had crossed the line in 11th place, ahead of Fernando Alonso, but dropped behind the Spaniard in the final classification. The penalty also prevented Lawson from realistically fighting for points: on track, the former Red Bull driver finished just over one second behind his teammate Hadjar, who was tenth, and he might have tried an attack on the sister car had he not been anticipating the time penalty.

Apr 23, 2025James Carter
Max Verstappen’s sarcastic message censored despite no foul language | F1 Saudi Arabian GPDid Mohammed Ben Sulayem tell Max Verstappen to stay silent about Jeddah penalty?
You Might Also Like
 
Racing Bulls: Isack Hadjar happy with “perfect race, car good in every condition” at Suzuka
 
Helmut Marko explains Daniel Ricciardo exit: “He wasn’t at the level to return to Red Bull”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

8 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP, Liam Lawson, RBLiam Lawson, RB, Saudi Arabian GP8

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • McLaren’s Oscar Piastri shines in viral Google Pixel commercial, pokes fun at Alpine
  • Red Bull reshuffle: How Max Verstappen’s garage is changing for the Ford era
  • Lando Norris begins F1 title defense: Two-day simulator stint at McLaren MTC
  • F1 | Cadillac begins 2026 journey at Silverstone as front pull-rod solution emerges
  • Red Bull Powertrains: Ben Hodgkinson on the bold challenge of creating a new F1 engine

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}