GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » What happened to McLaren? Monaco exposes deeper issues for the MCL40

What happened to McLaren? Monaco exposes deeper issues for the MCL40. McLaren searching for answers after disappointing Monaco performance.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL40, 2026 F1

What has happened to McLaren? The team that dominated the sport for two seasons, establishing themselves as the absolute gold standard for clean aerodynamic concepts and chassis excellence, is now failing to unlock the true potential of a car designed for this new regulatory cycle. Severe reliability issues, highly aggressive design paths regarding the gearbox packaging, and chronic difficulties in finding pure downforce have heavily compromised the start of their championship campaign, leaving the papaya drivers feeling comfortable only in Miami.

Following a bruising qualifying session for McLaren around the tight streets of Monte Carlo, the performance deficit to the front of the grid appears much wider than initially feared. The session exposed new and unexpected limitations within the car, as the Woking-based squad failed to progress beyond the fourth row, leaving Oscar Piastri stranded in seventh position and Lando Norris in eighth.

Shattered certainties at Woking

The engineering minds at Woking had expected a far more competitive McLaren package relative to Mercedes, primarily believing that the unique nature of Monaco would mask the handling thresholds that surfaced during the opening flyaway rounds. The MCL40, running shorter gear ratios, had previously shown a tendency to bleed lap time down long straights, where the Mercedes W17 was better optimized to deploy its top-end speed and electrical energy. On a street track defined by low-speed corners, brief bursts of acceleration, and a lack of true straights, the competitive picture should have flipped. Instead, the car’s stark inability to generate efficient aerodynamic load was exposed, despite several highly creative winglets added to the rear wing assembly.

This critical lack of surface grip and single-lap deficit has completely shattered a core technical belief within the team. McLaren’s current crisis is not merely isolated to electrical energy management or the radical architectural choices made around the gearbox layout; the issues run deeper. The car is actively struggling in the exact areas where the team used to be absolute masters: aerodynamics and chassis balance.

Clarity and realism from the cockpit

In short, the entire weekend has been severely compromised by a widespread lack of grip, forcing the team to pivot toward damage limitation for Sunday’s main event.

“I don’t know, in a way I sort of anticipated it. Maybe P7, but Hadjar and George did a good job, obviously with faster cars. You can’t expect much more, honestly. I think it’s clear that we are very far away. We are six, seven tenths behind on pace between Oscar and me. There was more potential: the car probably had the potential to do maybe a low 0.5 or a high 0.4, but even a high 0.4 wouldn’t have put us in better positions. It wasn’t a weekend where we had confidence in the car, where we had grip, where we could push like last year, but this is the situation we find ourselves in right now,” Lando Norris stated, summarizing the team’s grim qualifying reality.

“We have had an uphill weekend and qualifying showed it. My laps were strong until the last one, where I pushed a bit too hard looking for three-tenths and locked up. We made some progress compared to practice, but that was partly because the faster cars were being more conservative, while we were already at the limit,” Norris added, before laying out his expectations for Sunday. “Tomorrow we will be aggressive on the strategy and ready to seize any opportunity with a Safety Car or VSC, but overtaking here is difficult: we have to be realistic.”

Oscar Piastri echoed this realistic outlook, explaining the technical hurdles he faced on the other side of the garage.

“It hasn’t been an easy weekend for us. We came here expecting a challenge, and it has been one. The fundamental problem has been a general lack of grip; we made progress since Friday and improved the setup, but we are still missing speed. From my point of view, we extracted the maximum in qualifying and put together some decent laps,” Piastri explained.

“Looking ahead to the race, we have to be realistic: this circuit is notoriously difficult for overtaking and we don’t expect that to change. Our focus will be to execute a clean strategy and manage the car as best as we can. Anything can happen in Monaco, let’s see what we can do. After yesterday it was clear that we would be struggling; it’s been a long time since we were this far off the pace. Today we made the car better and the balance was more pleasant, but we were still missing about half a second,” Piastri concluded, admitting the massive gap came as a surprise relative to their initial simulations.

The engineering verdict from Andrea Stella

From the pit wall, Team Principal Andrea Stella provided a frank technical and logistical assessment of McLaren’s current performance ceiling.

“Today’s result is not what we were aiming for, because we thought a place on the third row was realistically within our reach. We started on the back foot yesterday, struggling with grip and overall performance. Thanks to the overnight work of the drivers, the trackside engineers, and the support team back at the factory, we made significant steps forward on the setup. This progression was visible in Q1 and Q2, where the car looked more competitive, relatively speaking. Unfortunately, we didn’t manage to put everything together in Q3. Lando was producing a very strong lap and was ahead by a few tenths, but a lockup at the chicane made him lose performance. Consequently, we will occupy the fourth row tomorrow. This circuit configuration does not completely suit the characteristics of our car, and we have work to do to improve in these conditions.”

Delving into specific handling characteristics, Norris pointed out the exact mechanical weaknesses the team must engineer out of the MCL40 platform moving forward.

“We struggle with certain aspects, with front locking and with the front of the car not working very well. But this is a car problem, not a tyre problem, and we need to work on it,” the British driver noted.

With Sunday’s grid layout offering minimal opportunities for organic on-track overtaking, McLaren’s strategy department will be forced to rely on precise pit-stop windows, a powerful launch off the line, and any potential neutralizations to salvage points and reward the massive engineering efforts deployed both at the track and back in Woking.

“We must be patient, remain focused, and ensure we are ready to maximize any opportunity, whether it’s at the start or with a Safety Car, to repay the great work of the team,” Stella concluded.


Diagnosing and curing the underlying front-end mechanical issues and downforce deficits of the MCL40 remains the definitive long-term priority for Andrea Stella’s technical team. While Sunday’s Monaco Grand Prix will require a highly disciplined, reactive strategy from the fourth row to maximize damage limitation, McLaren must urgently unlock sustainable aerodynamic compliance if they hope to re-establish themselves as a true front-running force in the upcoming European rounds.

Jun 7, 2026Sophie Bennett
Toto Wolff’s emotional reaction to Kimi Antonelli’s Monaco pole goes viralHow Carlos Sainz rescued Q1 only to lose out during tense Monaco GP shootout
You Might Also Like
 
Alpine’s Silverstone hopes fade after Franco Colapinto crash and Pierre Gasly penalty
 
Alpine targets Racing Bulls advantage as Franco Colapinto and Pierre Gasly eye Hungarian GP points

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sophie Bennett

Sophie Bennett combines a deep knowledge of Formula 1 with an approachable writing style. Whether it’s breaking news, driver interviews, or race recaps, Sophie delivers the F1 updates you can’t miss

3 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Monaco GP, Lando Norris, McLaren2026 Formula 1 season, Lando Norris, McLaren, Monaco GP4

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}