GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Red Bull’s costly overreaction: Max Verstappen wouldn’t have been penalised for Turn 1 cut in Spain

Red Bull’s costly overreaction: Max Verstappen wouldn’t have been penalised for Turn 1 cut in Spain. Red Bull instructed Verstappen to give up a position after a Turn 1 incident with Russell,.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull RB21, 2025 F1

Too much haste from the pit wall
The day after the Spanish GP, all attention is once again focused on Max Verstappen. Although he did not win, the Dutchman was the main protagonist of the day: first by putting McLaren under pressure with an ultra-aggressive three-stop strategy, then by crossing over to the “dark side” with a clumsy move on George Russell at Turn 5. That collision wiped out all the good he had done during the race, dropping him to tenth place as a result of the 10-second penalty handed down by the stewards.

The incredible part, however, is that it all stemmed from a rather glaring error by the Red Bull team: the Verstappen-Russell clash occurred after Gianpiero Lambiase, Max Verstappen’s race engineer, warned him to give back the position to his rival following a contact at Turn 1 during the restart after the Safety Car. On that occasion, the Briton had attempted an inside move on the world champion, who was slowed by the hard tyres. A slight contact between Verstappen’s rear right wheel and Russell’s front left led the #1 to partially cut the corner, rejoining the track ahead of the Mercedes.

From the Red Bull pit wall, expecting a penalty, the decision was made to voluntarily give back fourth place to the #63 Silver Arrow. However, the stewards were already reviewing the incident and later decided that no action was necessary, regardless of the position being given back. The chicane cut was not deemed irregular by the stewards, and Verstappen could have remained in fourth place behind Charles Leclerc. An incredible own goal for a team like Red Bull.

Reading the document published by the stewards, it is clearly stated that it was Russell’s move—albeit accidental—that caused the reigning champion to leave the track. “Car #63,” the official FIA note reads, “attempted to overtake Car #1 on the inside of Turn 1. While the front axle of Car #63 was ahead of the mirror of Car #1 at the apex, the driver of Car #63 momentarily lost control of the car and collided with Car #1, causing it to run wide and into the run-off area. Car #1 rejoined the track at Turn 3 ahead of Car #63. Given that the cause of Car #1 going off track was the loss of control by Car #63 and the resulting contact, Car #1 did not leave the track deliberately. Consequently, we took no further action.”

Adding insult to injury for the Milton Keynes team, the fact that the instruction to give back the position came directly from the Red Bull pit wall—without any obligation from the stewards—was also highlighted in the document that penalised Verstappen for the later contact with Russell: “From the radio communications, it is clear that the driver of Car #1 was instructed by his team to ‘give the position back’ to Car #63 for what they believed was a prior infringement by Car #1 for leaving the track and gaining a lasting advantage (in fact, we later determined that we would take no further action regarding that incident).”

Jun 3, 2025Sarah Thompson
Toto Wolff: "Max Verstappen behaving like past greats—blames the world instead of owning mistakes"Helmut Marko admits: "Yuki Tsunoda loses three tenths due to the car, but he shouldn’t chase Max Verstappen"
You Might Also Like
 
How Red Bull bounced back in 2025 F1: inside insights from a driver
 
Jack Doohan feels “Liam Lawson will be more of a threat at Racing Bulls than he was at Red Bull”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sarah Thompson

Sarah is a former karting champion turned journalist who combines her racing background with a love for writing.

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Spanish GP, Max Verstappen, Red BullMax Verstappen, Red Bull, Spanish GP10

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • George Russell’s painful 2026 F1 season: How bad luck, mistakes and Kimi Antonelli shattered his title dream
  • Honda admits it cannot identify Aston Martin battery failure cause as 2027 F1 concerns grow
  • Max Verstappen reveals 2027 Nürburgring and Spa 24 Hours plans but rules out Le Mans for now
  • Carlos Sainz slams Pirelli’s F1 wet tyres after Brazilian GP aquaplaning problems
  • Ralf Schumacher delivers brutal George Russell verdict with Kimi Antonelli and Barrichello comparison

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}