GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » How Racing Bulls and Williams “manipulated” Monaco with strategic precision

How Racing Bulls and Williams “manipulated” Monaco with strategic precision. Racing Bulls and Williams masterfully exploited Monaco’s two-stop rule.

Carlos Sainz, Williams 2025 F1 car

Extreme strategy
The 2025 Monaco GP will be remembered above all for the mandatory two-stop rule imposed by F1 and the FIA in an attempt — ultimately unsuccessful — to make the race in the Principality more exciting and spectacular. In reality, the only effect of this new rule was the creation of extremely slow “trains” around the track, as teams organized themselves perfectly to provide clean air and space behind one driver so he could pit without the risk of losing positions, using the other as a stopper.

No team played this game better than Racing Bulls and Williams, who managed to place all four of their drivers in the top ten. The Faenza team kicked off the chain of slowdowns, while Williams reacted during the race but still successfully capitalized on the plan. By analyzing the radio communications, we can reconstruct how the strategy of both teams unfolded.

Faenza makes the first move
Racing Bulls had settled on this strategy even before the race started: this became crystal clear when, on lap six, Lawson was told to “get to work.” “Let’s start the plan, let’s manage the tyres,” came the message from the pit wall. The New Zealander noted that the cars ahead of him weren’t pushing either, but the team’s strategists urged him to take it even further: “Let’s try to make these tyres last even longer, as we discussed.”

Lawson executed the job well, allowing Isack Hadjar to make his first stop on lap 14 without any difficulty, maintaining his position ahead of the entire pack slowed by car #30. At that point, the plan could continue: Lawson asked the pit wall whether he should “continue the strategy” and was given the green light. The former Racing Bulls driver kept up his snail’s pace to ensure his teammate could make another pit stop for free, while the Williams drivers behind him began to realize they needed to adapt to the situation.

Williams responds and ‘perfects’ the plan
On lap 17, Alex Albon opened up communication with his pit wall: “What do you suggest? I could slow down, give him the space he wants? I’ll catch up later, I’ll create my own gap, and Carlos can slow down. Let’s do the same thing.” The idea was to replicate Racing Bulls’ plan in Williams fashion, and the pit wall approved, given that both Grove cars were also running one behind the other.

On lap 25, Carlos Sainz was instructed to hold a pace of 1:19.0, slowing down the entire pack behind him — much to the frustration of the Mercedes team, who realized that all remaining hopes of a comeback and scoring points were vanishing.

The cherry on top for the team led by James Vowles came with the Alex Albon-Carlos Sainz teamwork, as the two agreed to swap positions so the Spaniard could also extend his stint and secure a calm pit stop, then later return the position to his teammate. “If we work as a team, we’ll take ninth and tenth place,” Albon was told on lap 42. And indeed, those were the final positions of the two British cars.

May 27, 2025Sarah Thompson
Red Bull strategized for a 25-point gap before flexi-wing rules, says Christian HornerSarcastic and furious: Fernando Alonso slams Aston Martin team strategy before Monaco DNF
You Might Also Like
 
Double disappointment for Racing Bulls in Singapore: Isack Hadjar let down by power unit
 
Monza 2025: Alex Albon turns weekend around with spectacular recovery drive for Williams

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sarah Thompson

Sarah is a former karting champion turned journalist who combines her racing background with a love for writing.

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Monaco GP, RB, WilliamsMonaco GP, RB, Williams2

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}