After a mid-season period marked by underwhelming performances due to technical problems, adaptation struggles, and a car that seemed to regress rather than improve, Antonelli’s results have been steadily improving. He is finally beginning to reap the rewards of extensive behind-the-scenes work.
Errors at Zandvoort and Monza had previously masked the full value of his performances. In Baku, however, without those mistakes, he converted potential into a solid fourth-place finish. A podium was narrowly missed, partially due to a different race strategy from his teammate, but this pattern has become a recurring theme in recent rounds.
Leveraging the potential of a competitive Mercedes capable of securing pole with George Russell, Antonelli’s fourth place carries significant weight for the Constructors’ Championship. Mercedes is fighting for second place behind Ferrari and Red Bull, and having both drivers consistently in the points will be crucial.
From a technical standpoint, Mercedes’ pole was surprising, yet there were indications the W16 could be competitive. While track temperature drops compared to FP3 helped, the real strength lay in traction and braking stability — qualities that have repeatedly given the W16 an advantage on similar circuits.
Despite his strong showing in practice and earlier qualifying sessions, Antonelli fell short in the decisive moment of Q3. This has been a recurring challenge for him this season; he has often struggled to shine in qualifying and is typically one of the top-team drivers who gains the least between Q2 and Q3.
In Singapore, Antonelli believes the key factor was emotional, not technical. He finished less than two-tenths behind Max Verstappen, but an error on his final run prevented him from lowering his lap time further. “Yes… it went well. Well, Q3 didn’t go well. In Q1 and Q2 I felt strong. On the first lap I hit traffic, so I felt some pressure because I didn’t have a benchmark yet. But then we managed to put together a good lap. In Q2 I really felt good in the car. I had a big oversteer on the second lap, but we were still among the very top,” Antonelli explained.
“In Q3, I think I let emotion get the better of me. I started a bit tense because I knew I had a real chance at least for the front row. We were fast. But I began to push too hard — driving faster and faster, carrying too much speed into corners. I went beyond the limit.”
Reflecting on his pre-weekend comments, Antonelli had identified a tendency to overdrive into corners as one of his main challenges with the Mercedes. He tried to extract more speed than the car could handle, often resulting in mistakes. That pattern repeated in Singapore, where small errors cost him at least third place, narrowly missing out to Oscar Piastri.
“It’s a shame because looking at the data, in most corners I was faster, even compared to Q2. But in a few key corners, I overdid it. Ironically, these were corners where pushing further wasn’t even necessary — we were already fast. And that’s where I lost everything. I feel really disappointed because the potential was much higher.”
The data confirms his account: comparing Q2 to Q3, Antonelli improved by just one-tenth of a second, despite not having a completely free lap. This clearly shows that he had untapped potential in the decisive run.
Notably, his best time came on the first run rather than the second, which was marred by an error in a sector where the Mercedes had been particularly strong all weekend — the middle of sector two, where traction makes the difference. That small mistake cost Antonelli roughly three-tenths compared to his best reference lap.
Even though Verstappen’s second attempt might have made a front-row finish difficult due to his narrow margin over Russell, comparing Antonelli’s potential best lap with the Dutchman’s first run shows that a front-row start was still within reach.
Leave a Reply