GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » McLaren disappoints in Austin Sprint Qualifying: an isolated case or a warning?

McLaren disappoints in Austin Sprint Qualifying: an isolated case or a warning?. Austin: McLaren surprised on track, but not in a positive way.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38, 2024

Just before the first free practice session for the United States Grand Prix, when the FIA released the list of technical updates brought by the teams for the Austin weekend, the pages for McLaren and Mercedes were the most extensive. A few hours later, the Sprint Qualifying standings (surprisingly) fully validated the work done by Mercedes engineers, while (again, surprisingly) delaying the effectiveness of McLaren’s updates. In the analyses of the current season conducted during the break after the Singapore Grand Prix, the most significant element of the ‘papaya’ cars’ rise was identified precisely in their upgrades. Until now, McLaren hadn’t failed a single upgrade, being the only top team to hit this target. That was until the Austin weekend.

Already in Singapore, team principal Andrea Stella hadn’t hidden some concerns about going on track in the U.S. with a substantial package of technical updates, but given the previous very positive results, it seemed more like a superstitious gesture than a real worry. Yesterday, however, Oscar Piastri didn’t make it past SQ1 (his best lap was canceled for exceeding track limits), while Lando Norris ended the day in fourth place, sandwiched between the two Ferraris and two-tenths behind poleman Max Verstappen. Is it an isolated case or a warning?

The MCL38, the universal car capable of adapting to every type of track and condition, caused its drivers quite a few problems. The operating window was narrow, and tire management on the softs wasn’t impeccable. In his fast lap in SQ3, Norris pushed hard in the first sector (where he posted the third-best time, behind Max Verstappen and a stellar Lewis Hamilton), but by the last few corners, the front tire temperatures were out of the operating window.

This explains the two-tenths lost (compared to Verstappen) in the last sector, which made the difference in the final time. Ahead of today’s Grand Prix qualifying, it will be crucial for McLaren’s engineers to understand whether yesterday’s issue was linked to Norris’s overly aggressive approach or if the setup needs adjusting. The team also suffers from the inability to compare with Piastri; if Oscar had also been in SQ3, the engineers would have had a much-needed reference point.

“I struggled all day with balance and setup,” commented Lando Norris at the end of the Austin Sprint Qualifying. “In the end, fourth position isn’t bad because I think the result could have been much worse. Considering that possibility, I wouldn’t say it was a terrible day. As for the problems that affected me, I don’t think it’s related to the new technical package; the reasons lie elsewhere.” – he pointed out.

After arriving in Austin with the goal of closing the gap to Max Verstappen, Lando Norris now finds himself (at least in the Sprint) in the opposite position: having to limit the damage. “There’s always hope of recovering positions,” Lando Norris concluded, “but in terms of pace, I think fourth position reflects exactly where we are. My plan is to move up, but honestly, I have no idea how far I can go.”

Oct 19, 2024Sarah Thompson
Oscar Piastri reacts to Red Bull T-Tray controversy: "Clearly a violation of the technical regulationsMax Verstappen, sprint pole in Austin and irony: "It’s been a while"
You Might Also Like
 
Suzuka setback for McLaren in qualifying: Andrea Stella banks on calm under pressure
 
Aston Martin: analysis of 2024 F1 crisis and plans to recover in 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sarah Thompson

Sarah is a former karting champion turned journalist who combines her racing background with a love for writing.

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 United States GP, McLaren2024 Formula 1 season, McLaren, United States GP8

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}