GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » McLaren and Red Bull lodge formal appeal over Pierre Gasly’s reinstated Monaco podium

McLaren and Red Bull lodge formal appeal over Pierre Gasly’s reinstated Monaco podium. FIA faces fresh scrutiny as McLaren and Red Bull contest Pierre Gasly podium verdict.

Pierre Gasly, Alpine, 2026 F1

F1 | McLaren and Red Bull move forward: appeal against Monaco podium returned to Gasly formalized

Through an official statement, McLaren has formalized its appeal against the stewards’ decision to cancel the two penalties imposed on Pierre Gasly during the Monaco Grand Prix, which had led to his podium being reinstated. Alongside the Woking-based squad, Red Bull has followed the exact same judicial process.

On the Friday of the Barcelona weekend, five days after the conclusion of the Monaco GP, the FIA stewards returned the podium to Pierre Gasly that the French Alpine driver had captured on the streets of the Principality, before he had dropped back in the classification due to two penalties for speeding in the pit lane.

However, during the appeal lodged by the Enstone team—the only outfit to appeal initially because Gasly had not served the penalty during the race itself—FOM, which is responsible for the official timing system, highlighted a discrepancy between the actual distance and the estimated distance of the sensors used for speed detection.

This discrepancy led to an overestimation of pit lane speeds, particularly for the cars that cut the entry line more sharply and therefore covered that specific section in less time. For this reason, the stewards ultimately decided to cancel the penalties imposed on Gasly and return the podium finish he had earned on track.

Teams fear a dangerous regulatory precedent

However, while Gasly’s sanctions were quashed, other drivers had already served their respective penalties during the live grand prix. This triggered immense disbelief from teams like McLaren and Red Bull regarding the stewards’ post-race verdict, which threatens to open up a significant precedent. Both teams had voiced their intention to appeal after the verdict, giving them a 96-hour window to either confirm or drop their legal position.

It is not the first time that teams have notified the governing body of their intent to appeal, utilizing the 96 hours at their disposal to calmly evaluate their options before ultimately deciding to back down. In this instance, however, both McLaren—who served a similar penalty in-race with Oscar Piastri—and Red Bull—who lost a maiden podium with senior team rookie Isack Hadjar—have chosen to proceed with the litigation, formalizing their appeal against the third-place finish returned to Gasly.

“McLaren Racing can confirm it has formally submitted a notice of appeal to the FIA International Court of Appeal in respect of the following decisions relating to the 2026 Monaco Grand Prix: Stewards’ Document 99; Document 100 of the Revised Final Race Classification; Document 101 of the Revised Championship Points,” McLaren stated in an official release.

“While we fully respect the FIA’s judicial processes and the role of the Stewards, we believe this case raises important questions regarding sporting fairness, regulatory consistency, and the integrity of the competition.”

“Throughout the Monaco Grand Prix weekend, and at every event, all teams operated in compliance with the regulations and standard practices established regarding the pit lane speed limit as applied at that time. Competitors adjusted their procedures accordingly and, where required, accepted and served the penalties imposed under those regulations.”

“In our view, the subsequent removal of penalties creates a situation where certain competitors are disadvantaged for having acted in accordance with the rules and the Stewards’ decisions. Such an outcome risks creating sporting disparity and undermining confidence in the consistent application of the FIA Sporting Regulations.”

“Our decision to appeal is not directed against any competitor. Rather, it reflects our belief that the Championship benefits from regulations that are applied consistently, transparently, and fairly for all participants. McLaren remains committed to working constructively with the FIA, Formula 1, and other competitors to protect the integrity of the sport and maintain trust in its regulatory framework.”

Red Bull remains silent but active behind the scenes

Red Bull has not yet gone public with an official press release, but according to information obtained by Motorsport.com, the Milton Keynes team has also decided to press ahead with the appeal. If successful, the challenge could return the Monaco podium finish to Isack Hadjar.

The core issue, however, extends far beyond the specific micro-result of the race; it centers on the risk that returning third place to the Alpine driver could create a historical precedent. This could potentially open the floodgates to an increasing number of retrospective review requests for penalties that drivers have already completely served during a grand prix.


In summary, the formal legal challenge lodged by McLaren and Red Bull over Pierre Gasly’s reinstated Monaco GP podium highlights a brewing political storm regarding sporting fairness and timing system accuracy. By taking a stand against the FIA’s post-race adjustments, both teams are seeking to protect the integrity of on-track penalties while attempting to reclaim lost accolades, such as Isack Hadjar’s lost top-three finish. As the appeal heads to the FIA International Court of Appeal, the final verdict will likely establish how the governing body handles technical discrepancies without destabilizing long-standing racing regulations.

Jun 17, 2026James Carter
Toto Wolff marks power unit battery flaws as number one priority for MercedesIsack Hadjar vents frustration at Red Bull over critical clutch bite point issues
You Might Also Like
 
Why the updated Red Bull RB21 couldn’t match McLaren in Mexico: the technical reasons
 
Andrea Stella outlines McLaren strategy for new floor and upcoming races

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

3 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Monaco GP, McLaren, Pierre Gasly, Red Bull2026 Formula 1 season, McLaren, Monaco GP, Pierre Gasly, Red Bull0

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}