GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Kimi Antonelli lawsuit: Minardi seeks up to 20% of Mercedes driver’s earnings

Kimi Antonelli lawsuit: Minardi seeks up to 20% of Mercedes driver’s earnings

Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes, 2024 F1

Kimi Antonelli is facing an ongoing civil lawsuit from Giovanni Minardi, who is reportedly seeking between 10% and 20% of the Mercedes driver’s earnings. The case has now also drawn Mercedes directly into the proceedings, with the Bologna court ordering the team and Antonelli to provide copies of contracts and extensive accounting documentation.

The legal dispute became public in July and centres on Antonelli’s previous relationship with Minardi Management. Giovanni Minardi, son of Gian Carlo Minardi, was the person who first spotted the current Formula 1 championship leader during a karting race at Sarno in 2014 and immediately brought him into Minardi Management.

How the Kimi Antonelli lawsuit began

Mercedes signed Kimi Antonelli in 2019 and later selected him as an official Formula 1 driver for the 2025 season, replacing Lewis Hamilton.

At that point, the young Italian exercised a unilateral termination of his agreement with Minardi Management.

That decision led Giovanni Minardi to take the matter to the Civil Court. Through lawyer Mattia Grassani, Minardi explained that he had initially attempted to resolve the dispute through an amicable settlement but that no agreement was reached.

He subsequently chose to pursue the case through the ordinary courts over what he described as “agreed compensation that was never paid”.

Mercedes and Antonelli ordered to provide contracts

There have now been further developments in the case, according to the latest edition of Corriere dello Sport.

On 9 September, the Bologna court ordered Mercedes and Kimi Antonelli to submit “copies of the contracts signed and extensive accounting documentation relating to payments made to the driver” since he began competing in Formula 1.

The documentation could prove central to establishing the value of the earnings involved and the size of any potential claim.

Minardi reportedly seeking between 10% and 20% of Antonelli’s earnings

Giovanni Minardi is reportedly seeking “a percentage between 10% and 20%” of the income already received and still to be received by Kimi Antonelli.

The potential amount involved is substantial. Antonelli earned more than €10 million in 2025 alone, with that figure including not only his base salary but also significant performance-related bonuses.

Those earnings are expected to rise further during an exceptional 2026 season in which the Bologna-born driver has so far claimed six pole positions and eight victories.

Mercedes reportedly frustrated by ongoing legal dispute

Corriere dello Sport also reported a degree of frustration within Mercedes over the case, which could continue for a considerable period of time.

The dispute therefore extends beyond Antonelli’s former management relationship and now involves documentation held by Mercedes, with the court seeking a clearer picture of the contractual and financial arrangements surrounding the driver’s Formula 1 career.

With Antonelli enjoying the most successful season of his career on track, the legal battle adds a significant off-track issue involving potentially substantial sums and an agreement dating back to the earliest stages of his development as a racing driver.

Oct 15, 2026John Matthews
Johnny Herbert urges George Russell to reset and challenge Kimi Antonelli in 2027Max Verstappen spotted Red Bull problem after just three laps, Laurent Mekies reveals
You Might Also Like
 
George Russell: “Times not meaningful yet, Melbourne will show our level” | F1 Testing
 
George Russell confirms Mercedes engine penalty will coincide with ADUO upgrade

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

2 days ago F1 News, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season1

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Mercedes W17 analysis: why the Sepang aero package may be the better 2027 choice
  • Max Verstappen wants fewer F1 races, V8 engines and a more logical calendar
  • Mercedes refuses to abandon troubled upgrade as Austin becomes decisive test
  • George Russell considers Las Vegas grid penalty for Mercedes power unit upgrade
  • Red Bull reveals how AI is influencing race strategy around Max Verstappen

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}