GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » George Russell on F1’s chaotic start rule: “Some teams don’t want it fixed”

George Russell on F1’s chaotic start rule: “Some teams don’t want it fixed”. George Russell explains the complicated start rule that caused chaos in Australia.

George Russell, Mercedes W17, 2026 F1

Professor Russell

George Russell took on the role of professor during the traditional media day press conference ahead of the Chinese Grand Prix, explaining a peculiar twist in the regulations that complicated life for many teams at the start of the Australian GP, making the opening phase extremely chaotic and dangerous. Alongside the educational explanation, the championship leader didn’t shy away from a pointed comment that—without explicitly naming them—seemed aimed at Ferrari.

“I think there was a rule that caught many teams off guard, namely the power limit during the formation lap,” George Russell explained to journalists. “It’s a very specific regulation: I don’t know if you’re aware, but each lap has a power limit. Drivers starting in the first half of the grid, beyond the timing line where lap times are taken, were already on a new lap. So when you start the formation lap, you use and recharge the battery, which counts toward the energy recovery limit of that lap. Drivers at the back of the grid, on the other hand, when they start their formation lap, cross the start-finish line and their count resets because they are effectively already on the next lap.”

This technicality makes a significant difference, as those starting further back can recharge more energy. Moreover, during start practice, teams hadn’t accounted for this detail, meaning they had simulated the formation laps incorrectly.

A dig at Ferrari?

“During our start practice, we started before this line, so when we crossed it, the count reset,” George Russell continued. “But at the race start, starting from pole, I accelerated, recharged the battery, and this consumed roughly 50% of the energy recovery limit for that lap. By the time I reached mid-track, I couldn’t recharge the battery anymore, so I didn’t have enough energy to perform proper burnouts.”

Then came the pointed remark: “The FIA was considering changing this rule, but as you can imagine, some teams that were making good starts didn’t want it changed, which I think is a bit silly. Anyway, I’m not too worried, but it’s definitely a challenge,” he concluded.

The 2026 regulations therefore continue to reveal these strange “ghost in the machine” anomalies and George Russell’s frustration highlights the immense mental load currently placed on drivers. It isn’t just about the 0 to 100 km/h sprint anymore; it’s a mathematical battle against the timing line before the lights even go out. With Ferrari having shown superior launch performance in Melbourne, it is no wonder George Russell feels the “silly” resistance to a rule change is coming from Maranello. As we head into the Shanghai weekend, all eyes will be on the front row to see if Mercedes has found a software workaround for this energy trap, or if the “back-of-the-grid” advantage will once again leave the pole-sitter vulnerable when it matters most.

Mar 12, 2026John Matthews
Fernando Alonso hits back at critics: “If you win titles by only beating your teammate, you’re God”F1 China 2026: Honda develops countermeasure for Aston Martin AMR26 vibrations
You Might Also Like
 
F1 | Aston Martin concerns deepen as Lance Stroll admits widespread performance issues
 
Mercedes W16 development: highlights and challenges of 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

6 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Chinese GP, George Russell, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season, George Russell, Mercedes10

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}