GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » F1, Red Bull: how technical directives influenced the Imola race victory

F1, Red Bull: how technical directives influenced the Imola race victory. Red Bull secured a decisive victory at Imola in the 2025 F1 season.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull RB21, 2025 F1

Red Bull won the seventh round of the 2025 F1 season. The Imola weekend started very promisingly for McLaren. The Woking team’s drivers effectively dominated all the practice sessions without problems. However, when it came down to racing, Max Verstappen showed he could be a real threat to the English team’s drivers, and that’s how it turned out.

The overtake at Tamburello was a product of the reigning world champion’s flair. Piastri was probably close enough in the fight with Max, imagining a scenario similar to Miami where a Red Bull struggled with race pace. McLaren’s men, led by Andrea Stella, expected the race to favor the Australian driver thanks to better tire management.

But after just a few laps, it became clear that the RB21 at Imola was not only capable of holding off the championship leader’s MCL39 but also pulling away during the two restarts after the Virtual and Safety Cars. This surprised almost everyone, especially the McLaren team principal, who openly admitted it after the race.

Objective factors and those hard to measure

What changed from Miami to Imola? Several objective factors and others difficult to measure. Let’s start with circuit geometry. The RB21 showed it could compete in high-speed corners in Japan and Jeddah. Max’s monstrous first qualifying sector confirmed the Austrian car’s aptitude for particular corner geometries.

Secondly, at the Made in Italy and Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix, the RB21 debuted a substantial upgrade package developed by the technical group led by Pierre Waché. Even Verstappen does not know how much this first development package added. Again, some surprise was evident.

What is certain is that it worked without any performance downgrade, as the blue racing cars showed more pace. Only Max managed to extract the maximum, being a deep connoisseur of the RB21. However, just before the first Italian F1 round, the FIA issued two technical directives that, rather than changing the rules, clarified them.

McLaren legal under FIA microscope

To contextualize the political fight between Red Bull and McLaren, it is necessary to recall that after the Miami Grand Prix, Oscar Piastri’s car underwent the following inspections:

3.13 – Compliance of all inspected components with the technical regulation article (Wheel Bodywork):
3.13.1 – General principles
3.13.2 – Brake drum
3.13.3 – Brake Scoop
3.13.4 – Internal cooling ducts
3.13.5 – Front drum deflector
3.13.6 – Rear drum deflector
3.13.7 – Wheel Cover
11.5 – Brake System – Liquid Cooling

In short, a true X-ray of the McL39 braking system. A symbolic check that confirmed the total legality of the solutions adopted on the papaya cars. Despite this meticulous inspection of the best car in this early part of the season, the skirmishes between the two teams have not calmed down. The war continues.

The FIA added “fuel to the fire” by issuing clarifications just before the Imola Grand Prix on two much-discussed areas: the skid blocks located on the car’s plank and tire cooling. Regarding the plank, the governing body specified the allowed materials and mounting methods to prevent assemblies that achieve minimal ride height yet still pass post-race skid block inspections. On tire cooling, the FIA clarified the line between legal and illegal practices. Essentially… a way to shed as much light and clarity as possible on key situations.

Red Bull’s Imola triumph born from FIA clarifications

Putting one and one together, it could be simplistically thought that the directives received by the teams before Imola from the FIA somehow played a decisive role in McLaren’s first truly off-form race of 2025. Stella is pleased that competitors are focusing their attention on areas that are not the real strength of the English cars.

The team led by Christian Horner expressed surprise after the race at the poor race pace of the papaya cars, hinting that the two McLarens may have had to sacrifice (perhaps) a bit of performance due to the clarifications provided by the FIA before the Italian weekend on the banks of the Santerno river.

What is certain, thinking logically, is that doubts about the legality of McLaren’s project can only be dispelled after the Spanish Grand Prix next week, when the long-discussed TD018 directive comes into effect—a stricter rule on front wing flexibility. The championship of suspicions has only just begun…

May 22, 2025John Matthews
F1 | McLaren’s MCL39 setup secrets and tyre temperatures: the hidden advantage in MonacoRed Bull RB21: how the aerodynamic map revealed its performance leap at Imola
You Might Also Like
 
Max Verstappen: “Old-school Monza, I like it. We need to improve our tyre management” | F1 Italian GP
 
F1 | Checkmate for the king: How Las Vegas could end Max Verstappen’s title hopes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Emilia Romagna GP, Red BullEmilia Romagna GP, Imola, Red Bull2

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}