GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » F1 | Mercedes’ bi-phase front wing sparks debate as FIA opens investigation

F1 | Mercedes’ bi-phase front wing sparks debate as FIA opens investigation. Mercedes faces FIA investigation over the W17’s bi-phase front wing.

Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes W17, 2026 F1

The teams, following the Chinese Grand Prix, submitted their design documents to the International Federation. One team reportedly requested clarification from the governing body regarding the W17’s front wing flaps, which appear to close well beyond the 400 milliseconds mandated by regulations, with two distinct and longer movements.

The scrutiny on Mercedes continues, this time not for the power unit but for aerodynamics. While the matter of the internal combustion engine seems likely to conclude by June 1 without major repercussions, a second area of discussion has emerged.

This time the spotlight is on the W17’s front wing aerodynamics. Following the Chinese Grand Prix, the teams, according to regulations, were invited to make the designs of their solutions available for review. As with other teams, the FIA was able to examine the concepts developed on the new, more agile cars.

Mercedes under FIA observation for bi-phase wing operation

Mercedes appears to be under scrutiny by the FIA for its movable front wing, which reportedly operates in a “bi-phase” manner. The wing’s closing movement happens in two stages: the first stage complies with the 400 milliseconds required by the rules, responding to the sensor reading that controls the movable aerodynamics. The second command, which completes the actual closure of the profiles, extends the closing time by an additional 450 milliseconds.

A quick search online reveals clips showing the Mercedes wing in action, demonstrating the bi-phase mechanism. This has fueled speculation of a possible irregularity that the FIA will need to evaluate. The system is thought to reduce the sudden load transfer to the front just before braking, improving car balance during the delicate entry into corners.

Clarification requests and team responses

Autoracer.it reports that they initially attributed the regulatory clarification request to Ferrari, but the Scuderia has denied this. According to information held by Motorsport.com, the notification appears to have come from another, as yet unnamed, team in the Formula 1 paddock. More details are expected during the Suzuka weekend.

The technical verdict lies ahead

Now the matter passes to the technical staff led by Nikolas Tombazis. The Japanese Grand Prix weekend will be crucial in resolving this issue and preventing further controversy from erupting.

The technical battle of the 2026 season is therefore proving to be as much about “creative” software timing as it is about physical hardware. Mercedes appears to have found a loophole that allows for a more progressive aerodynamic transition, but with rival teams crying foul, the FIA’s verdict will be a major talking point at Suzuka. Based on the content of the technical drawings submitted after China, the federation’s engineers have a complex task ahead to define where “natural mechanical lag” ends and “illegal aero staging” begins.

Mar 25, 2026James Carter
Fernando Alonso to miss Thursday at Suzuka due to family, set to race FridayAntonelli a championship contender? Riccardo Patrese: “Russell won’t sleep thinking about Kimi”
You Might Also Like
 
Mercedes plans major W17 upgrade as Ferrari closes the gap
 
Max Verstappen on quitting F1: “I could walk away tomorrow without any problem”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

6 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Japanese GP, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season, Japanese GP, Mercedes7

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}