GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » F1 | Marko criticizes Norris: “He blocked Max, incomprehensible.” But was it a pole lap?

F1 | Marko criticizes Norris: “He blocked Max, incomprehensible.” But was it a pole lap?. Red Bull advisor Helmut Marko criticizes Lando Norris for allegedly blocking Max Verstappen.

Helmut Marko, Max Verstappen, 2024

On a day when Red Bull hoped to surprise everyone, it was George Russell who outpaced his rivals and took the top spot. However, the Milton Keynes team voiced complaints, claiming that Lando Norris blocked Max Verstappen during his final qualifying attempt. But would that lap have actually been good enough for pole position for the Dutch driver?

Before qualifying, Red Bull was confident the fight for pole would be extremely tight, decided by mere hundredths of a second. And that’s exactly how it played out: without the incident at the final chicane affecting Verstappen’s last lap, the gap to George Russell would have been minimal.

For this reason, both the four-time world champion and Red Bull advisor Helmut Marko fueled the discussion about the incident, specifically focusing on Lando Norris, who allegedly hindered the Red Bull driver at the entry of the final chicane.

According to the Milton Keynes advisor, Norris’s presence significantly influenced Verstappen’s lap, as the Dutchman was slightly off-line entering the last chicane, losing the crucial tenths that cost him a chance to challenge Russell.

“Qualifying went as expected, but Lando Norris’s actions are incomprehensible. We were already one and a half tenths faster than our previous lap, and he completely blocked Max in the last two corners,” Marko commented, speaking bluntly about the British driver’s behavior during the final lap.

“For Norris, there was nothing at stake, so for me it remains inexplicable. Max would have been extremely close [to Russell]. I hope he wasn’t checking his mirrors. I can’t imagine it was intentional,” the Red Bull consultant added, noting that Singapore isn’t exactly a track suited to highlighting the best qualities of the RB21, yet the team was still ahead of McLaren.

Marko sees this as an encouraging sign for the coming races, suggesting the team’s championship hopes, while slim, are not yet dead: “The fact that we are ahead of both McLarens shows we are competitive here, and that gives us confidence for the upcoming races. Of course, starting position is crucial, but as long as we are ahead of McLaren, it’s already a success for us.”

However, a question remains: did Norris’s actions really cost Verstappen a pole position? As Marko noted, Verstappen was improving over his first attempt, shaving about one and a half tenths off his time, but he was still over one and a half tenths behind Russell’s benchmark.

Norris had made the difference primarily in the middle sector, where Mercedes could exploit traction out of slow corners, a strength throughout the season. The final sector, with its long straights and DRS-dependent zones, seemed ideal for Red Bull, which had already shown better pace at the start of Q3.

Even if Verstappen had matched his previous sector times in the final section, it would not have been enough for pole: Russell would have kept first place by just 32 thousandths. Essentially, the world champion needed a record-breaking last sector, better than his previous one, but the references were not in his favor.

Looking at the micro-sectors, Verstappen had not improved significantly up to that point, partly due to an imperfect passage through turn 14, leaving a few hundredths that resulted in a slightly slower entry into turn 16. He tried to recover on the following straight, but that’s where the error occurred.

Marko blamed Norris, but in reality the British driver was quite distant when Verstappen approached the braking point of turn 16, so there was no true impeding. Telemetry shows that Max actually lifted slightly later than on his previous lap, entering aggressively but failing to correct it.

In fact, Verstappen was in contention for pole, but even without the braking error at turn 16, he would have needed a flawless final chicane and last corner to beat Russell and take first position.

“It happens when you have a car ahead moving calmly two seconds in front. It was noticed, and it will be remembered,” Verstappen said afterward. Norris appeared surprised by the reigning world champion’s complaints, convinced he was still far enough ahead not to affect the rival. “They always complain. They complain about everything. It’s Red Bull. I don’t even know. I was like three seconds ahead. I can’t understand it,” the British driver said while returning to the pits.

Red Bull Team Principal Laurent Mekies also expressed doubt that the incident truly influenced the pole fight, as it probably wouldn’t have been enough to beat Russell anyway.

“First of all, I think it was a very solid qualifying for Max and the team, once again. It’s nice to see some long faces when you take the front row, and of course we believe we would have been much closer to George without that traffic in the last corner, but that’s life. I won’t say we would have been ahead, but Max would definitely have been there, very close,” Mekies explained.

Oct 4, 2025Daniel Novak
Red Bull closes in on McLaren: how Max Verstappen is shaking up the F1 championshipRed Bull and McLaren clash after qualifying, Norris fires back: "They complain about everything" – Singapore GP
You Might Also Like
 
McLaren ready for a “reset”: no privileges for Lando Norris in 2025 F1 season
 
Nürburgring 24 Hours 2026: full schedule and how to watch Max Verstappen live

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Daniel Novak

Daniel Novak is a seasoned F1 reporter with a passion for precision and storytelling. His coverage spans everything from race weekends to team politics, giving fans an all-access pass to the action on and off the track

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Singapore GP, Lando Norris, Max Verstappen, Red Bull2025 Formula 1 season, Helmut Marko, Max Verstappen, Singapore GP9

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}