GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » F1 | Compression ratio controversy: Red Bull’s Hodgkinson launches fierce response

F1 | Compression ratio controversy: Red Bull’s Hodgkinson launches fierce response. Red Bull power unit director Ben Hodgkinson strongly defends the legality of the team’s engine.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull RB21, 2025 F1

A brutal attack from Ben Hodgkinson, Red Bull’s Power Unit director in Formula 1: “Anyone who doesn’t understand certain things is not a real engineer.”

Red Bull Power Unit director Ben Hodgkinson has launched a scathing response to the rumors that have stirred controversy in the Formula 1 paddock over recent weeks. While the outcome of the meeting between the teams and the FIA is still awaited, there is a clear sense of calm coming from Milton Keynes. The Austrian team, which has been mentioned alongside Mercedes in accusations of potential illegality, is firmly convinced that it is on the right side of the regulations.

Just days before the Barcelona tests, the paddock is split. On one side are Mercedes and Red Bull, accused of having found a way to bypass the new compression ratio limit on their power units. On the other are Ferrari, Audi and Honda, all calling loudly for clarification. The final word will rest with the FIA, although it seems unlikely that the governing body will take decisive action already ahead of the upcoming season.

The issue is a complex one. The new engines have been under development for several years, based on technical regulations that Honda executives themselves have described as “open to multiple interpretations.” Closing this grey area would mean forcing teams to introduce changes that would be extremely difficult to implement in the short term. Moreover, the actual illegality of the cars produced in Brackley and Milton Keynes has yet to be proven.

Hodgkinson: “Materials change with temperature, everyone knows that”

Strongly reaffirming the legality of the Red Bull–Ford power unit is Ben Hodgkinson himself, the man leading the project. The British engineer argues that the rumors are nothing more than a move by Mercedes to boost its own appeal after several disappointing seasons. The Milton Keynes technical director then goes even further, pointing the finger at engineers who, in his view, “don’t understand” the fundamentals of the issue.

“This whole situation is frustrating for me, as an engineer,” Hodgkinson said on the sidelines of the RB22 livery presentation. “I know what we are doing and I am convinced it is legal. Obviously, we have pushed things to the absolute limit of what the regulations allow. I would be surprised if everyone else hadn’t done the same.”

“Any engineer who doesn’t understand the concept of thermal expansion doesn’t belong in this sport, and in fact doesn’t even deserve to be called an engineer,” he continued. “Understanding how materials behave at different temperatures, pressures, stresses and loads is literally our job.”

“The regulations are super, super clear on the compression ratio,” Hodgkinson added. “There is a limit of 16:1. The regulations specify that this ratio must be measured in a very precise way. There is a document that describes exactly how the measurement is carried out, and it must be done at ambient temperature. So everything is extremely clear.”

Jan 22, 2026James Carter
F1 | Max Verstappen and the 2026 turning point: Red Bull continuity or Mercedes move?F1 | Racing Bulls VCARB03 makes track debut: first technical insights into the 2026 car
You Might Also Like
 
Max Verstappen retirement: why an early F1 exit would be a major loss
 
Cadillac confirms own power unit for 2029: identity matters more than strategy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

8 months ago F1 News, Red Bull2026 Formula 1 season, Red Bull7

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}