GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Why Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s FIA power unit proposal could hurt smaller F1 teams

Why Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s FIA power unit proposal could hurt smaller F1 teams. Could an FIA-built power unit leave smaller Formula 1 teams behind?.

Alpine A526, 2026 F1

Over the past few days, several media outlets have reported on Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s vision for the future of Formula 1. Among the FIA president’s proposals is a significant shift away from the current turbo-hybrid era, a reduced emphasis on electrification, and a new approach to the concept of customer teams.

One of the Emirati president’s most talked-about ideas is the creation of an FIA-developed power unit that any new team entering Formula 1 could use without relying on an existing manufacturer.

The objective behind the proposal is both clear and understandable. By offering an FIA-built engine, the governing body hopes to reduce the influence of major manufacturers like Mercedes, which currently supplies power units to three customer teams and can therefore hold considerable political weight in discussions with the FIA whenever major regulatory issues arise.

An ambitious but unrealistic proposal?

Despite its good intentions, the concept also has several weaknesses, as former Formula 1 technical director Gary Anderson recently pointed out in an insightful article for The Race.

The introduction of Formula 1’s cost cap has helped narrow the technological gap between the leading teams and those further down the grid. However, a standard FIA-developed power unit would be unlikely to contribute to that same objective.

Every Formula 1 team continuously pushes the regulations to their limits in search of competitive advantages. Engineers regularly interpret the rules in innovative ways, finding solutions that maximize performance while remaining within the boundaries of the regulations.

This is already evident in the development of the 2026 cars, many of which differ significantly from the original concept presented by the FIA. Teams have introduced creative interpretations that, while technically legal, often stretch the intended spirit of the regulations. The FIA itself could never pursue similar approaches, as it would be expected to follow its own rulebook to the letter.

Smaller teams could be left even further behind

It is reasonable to assume that the same differences in engineering philosophy would also apply to the development of a future Formula 1 power unit, regardless of the architecture or technology eventually adopted.

An FIA-supplied engine would inevitably evolve at a slower pace than manufacturer-developed power units, which benefit from the vast engineering resources and innovative capabilities of Formula 1’s major automotive companies.

Rather than helping smaller teams become more competitive, such a solution could actually place them at a significant disadvantage. Teams relying on a standard FIA power unit would likely struggle to match rivals using continuously developed manufacturer engines, making it even more difficult to score the points that are often crucial for their financial survival and long-term future in Formula 1.

Jul 12, 2026Daniel Novak
Lando Norris dreams of racing with Valentino Rossi at Le MansGeorge Russell dismisses No. 1 driver claims as Mercedes focuses on Ferrari
You Might Also Like
 
Red Bull boss: FIA sees driver complaints coming over 2026 F1 battery use
 
Gabriel Bortoleto backs Audi appeal over Yuki Tsunoda Monza decision: “The regulations are clear”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Daniel Novak

Daniel Novak is a seasoned F1 reporter with a passion for precision and storytelling. His coverage spans everything from race weekends to team politics, giving fans an all-access pass to the action on and off the track

2 months ago F1 NewsFIA, Mohammed Ben Sulayem3

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}