GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Verstappen, Norris and Piastri raise fresh concerns despite FIA’s 2026 rule tweaks

Verstappen, Norris and Piastri raise fresh concerns despite FIA’s 2026 rule tweaks. FIA’s F1 2026 fixes show progress, but drivers say major problems remain.

Zak Brown, Oscar Piastri, Lando Norris, 2026 F1

One of the most closely watched topics heading into the Miami Grand Prix weekend was the regulatory front, with considerable attention focused on the FIA’s adjustments following the major performance and safety concerns that emerged during the opening three races of the 2026 Formula 1 season. After the Miami weekend, it is fair to say that some positive responses have emerged, with several drivers acknowledging that the direction of travel appears to be the right one. However, the question marks have not disappeared, as many of the sport’s leading figures explained at the end of the weekend.

Verstappen acknowledges progress, Norris remains critical: “we should just get rid of the battery”

The Miami weekend delivered encouraging signs on the regulatory front, with the improvements introduced by the FIA appearing to generate some tangible benefits, particularly in qualifying, where drivers once again had greater influence compared to what was seen during the opening three Grands Prix of the season. The general direction appears positive, as several drivers admitted, but skepticism remains over certain aspects, especially in race conditions.

Several drivers addressed the issue while speaking to the media, with Max Verstappen—long one of the most vocal critics of the 2026 Formula 1 regulations—once again offering a measured but skeptical assessment.

“My car drives a bit better, but what I said previously about the rules remains exactly the same,” he told RacingNews365.

According to the Dutchman, while the regulatory adjustments represent a move in the right direction, the core issues have not disappeared.

“You still have to go a bit slower in some places in order to be faster. So it is still not how it should be. It remains punitive—the faster you go through a corner, the slower you go down the next straight; it should not be like that.”

Lando Norris, who finished second in Miami, also weighed in on the debate: “It is a small step in the right direction, but still not at the level Formula 1 should be,” declared the reigning world champion – “If in qualifying you go all-out and push like in previous years, you still get penalised. You still cannot go flat-out everywhere, and you should never be punished for pushing, yet that still happens.”

According to the McLaren driver, the current generation of Formula 1 machinery may never fully eliminate these issues: “Honestly, I do not think this can really be fixed—we just need to get rid of the battery, so I hope in a few years that is the case,” he added bluntly.

Piastri explains why overtaking still feels ‘artificial’, while Sainz calls for calmer debate

Oscar Piastri echoed a similar theme, acknowledging the improvements while also insisting that more changes will be required in the future.

“I think reducing the recharge limit in qualifying helped a little, even if it did not solve every problem,” he said during the post-race press conference.

The Australian also described what it feels like to race under the current regulations when battling wheel-to-wheel.

“The races are pretty much the same, and I think today was my first real experience of both overtaking and defending. It is quite absurd, to be honest. At one point I saw on my dash that George was one second behind, but then he managed to overtake me by the end of that same straight—it all feels a bit random.”

For the defending driver, anticipating the move is incredibly difficult, according to Piastri.

“I did not like George’s overtake on me, but then I found myself doing exactly the same move five laps later, simply because the speed difference is enormous.”

Given that situation, Piastri believes further intervention is necessary.

“From that point of view, not much has changed. I think the collaboration between the FIA and Formula 1 has been good, but there are only so many things you can change with the hardware we currently have. Without doubt, I think more changes are needed. The big question is how quickly we can make them happen.”

Andrea Kimi Antonelli also backed up Piastri’s explanation, highlighting another important issue: “You also need to trust the driver who is defending,” added the Miami Grand Prix winner.

“Because with active aerodynamics, the car is quite lazy in changes of direction. You have to think ahead, and you also need to trust the driver in front of you. It is a small step in the right direction—we will see what happens.”

Among the drivers, there were also calls for a more balanced tone in the discussion around the regulations. Carlos Sainz argued that, while the problems are clear to everyone, the time may have come to reduce the intensity of the criticism and focus instead on constructive improvements. “Overtaking is more about strategy in terms of engine mapping than what the driver actually does,” the Williams driver told ESPN.

“So I think these regulations still have room for improvement, but I also think it is time to stop criticising so much and continue pushing for changes in the right direction.”

May 12, 2026Sophie Bennett
2026 Nürburgring 24 Hours preview: Max Verstappen’s debut, favourites, and full scheduleAudi’s real F1 problem is not speed: why the R26 keeps wasting its potential
You Might Also Like
 
F1 McLaren revival explained: Zak Brown on culture shift and team spirit
 
Racing Bulls eye historic upset as Red Bull struggles early in 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sophie Bennett

Sophie Bennett combines a deep knowledge of Formula 1 with an approachable writing style. Whether it’s breaking news, driver interviews, or race recaps, Sophie delivers the F1 updates you can’t miss

4 months ago F1 News, Lando Norris, Max Verstappen, Oscar Piastri2026 Formula 1 season, Lando Norris, Max Verstappen, Oscar Piastri4

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}