GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » The technical reasons behind Mercedes’ decision to scrap anti-lift rear suspension

The technical reasons behind Mercedes’ decision to scrap anti-lift rear suspension. Mercedes has abandoned its innovative rear anti-lift suspension.

George Russell, Mercedes W16, 2025 F1

Mercedes’ innovative rear suspension package introduced at the Imola Grand Prix has yielded mixed results, leading to its complete abandonment by the time of the Hungarian Grand Prix. This suspension system aimed to reduce rear axle lift under load, maintaining a consistent floor height and thus ensuring stable downforce levels throughout a lap.

The solution showed promising signs in Montreal, where George Russell secured Mercedes’ first — and so far only — victory of the 2025 season. However, as explained by Mercedes’ track technical director Andrew Shovlin, the unique characteristics of the Canadian circuit masked inherent stability issues that reappeared during subsequent races.

Unlike Ferrari and McLaren, which have seen good results from similar suspension concepts, Mercedes faced challenges stemming from the limitations of their existing gearbox housing design. Unlike designing a fresh system from scratch, Mercedes had to integrate the new suspension with a gearbox casing that was not originally developed for this purpose. “Designing a suspension always involves compromises between aerodynamic needs, kinematics, and stiffness,” Shovlin said. “When the gearbox design is already set, those compromises become even more severe. And with the budget cap, you can’t just start over from zero.”

The technical reasons
Modern Formula 1 cars rely heavily on ground-effect floors that are extremely sensitive to ride height variations. Maintaining a consistent ride height is essential to achieving optimal aerodynamic performance throughout every phase of cornering. This concept dates back to the early 1980s when the Lotus 88 pioneered — albeit in a primitive form compared to today’s standards — the “twin chassis” system: a soft internal chassis combined with a rigid external frame designed to stabilise the Venturi tunnels and maximise ground-effect efficiency.

Current anti-lift rear suspension designs follow a similar philosophy, aiming to keep the car’s floor at a fixed static height to preserve aerodynamic efficiency. As gains from further floor development have become marginal, teams have increasingly invested in refining suspension kinematics to extend the ideal operating conditions of the floor.

Andrew Shovlin also noted that, beyond technical considerations, external factors influenced the decision to abandon the system. With the 2026 regulation overhaul approaching rapidly, many teams are dedicating their remaining wind tunnel hours to developing their next-generation cars, while simultaneously seeking performance gains in less explored areas.

Shovlin acknowledged that McLaren has pushed strongly in this direction, but for Mercedes, the risks outweighed the rewards. “In the end, we saw that the package was limiting us more than it was helping,” he concluded.

With the second half of the 2025 season underway and the team’s focus already on 2026, Mercedes is now prioritising more stable and reliable solutions to extract the maximum potential from the W16 during the final races under the current technical regulations.

Aug 9, 2025Sophie Bennett
James Vowles discusses Carlos Sainz’s struggles: “We can’t give him a Ferrari”Guenther Steiner praises Lando Norris but backs Oscar Piastri for 2025 Formula 1 title
You Might Also Like
 
Kimi Antonelli reflects on Spa redemption one year after hitting “rock bottom”
 
Why Mercedes must protect Kimi Antonelli from the pressure of sudden stardom

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sophie Bennett

Sophie Bennett combines a deep knowledge of Formula 1 with an approachable writing style. Whether it’s breaking news, driver interviews, or race recaps, Sophie delivers the F1 updates you can’t miss

1 year ago F1 News, Mercedes2025 Formula 1 season, Mercedes16

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • George Russell’s painful 2026 F1 season: How bad luck, mistakes and Kimi Antonelli shattered his title dream
  • Honda admits it cannot identify Aston Martin battery failure cause as 2027 F1 concerns grow
  • Max Verstappen reveals 2027 Nürburgring and Spa 24 Hours plans but rules out Le Mans for now
  • Carlos Sainz slams Pirelli’s F1 wet tyres after Brazilian GP aquaplaning problems
  • Ralf Schumacher delivers brutal George Russell verdict with Kimi Antonelli and Barrichello comparison

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}