GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Red Bull RB21: Low-downforce wing crucial for pole, but Max Verstappen made the difference | F1 Italian GP

Red Bull RB21: Low-downforce wing crucial for pole, but Max Verstappen made the difference | F1 Italian GP. Red Bull’s last-minute low-downforce wing change helped Max Verstappen secure pole at Monza.

Max Verstappen, Lando Norris, 2025 F1

Sometimes, the difference lies in the details, and it comes down to daring choices, as Red Bull demonstrated by changing Max Verstappen’s rear wing at the very last moment before qualifying to seek more straight-line speed with the DRS closed. It was a calculated risk that paid off, but the pole position also owes a lot to the Dutch driver, particularly for how he managed sectors two and three.

It’s all a subtle game of balance. When the gaps shrink and the grid tightens, details, choices, and sometimes bold gambles decide the outcome. It’s in these moments that teams look for the final fractions of a second that separate pole from second place. Red Bull knows this well, daring to run a lower-downforce rear wing just before qualifying.

An audacious move, considering that during the practice sessions the Milton Keynes team had never tested this configuration with a cut DRS flap, relying only on simulations to predict the impact on top speed and car balance. Still, the decision showed that Red Bull believed in the possibility of stealing pole from its rivals.

As highlighted in Friday’s practice analysis, the Verstappen–Red Bull combination should never be underestimated, particularly on a track that rewards the high-efficiency characteristics the car has displayed repeatedly throughout the season. Signals of a competitive RB21 had already emerged on the first day, especially once power levels were increased and soft-tyre issues were resolved.

Data analysis revealed that despite the lower-downforce wing this year, Max was slightly slower on the straights compared to his 2024 lap when the Red Bull ran a higher-downforce wing, less suited to Monza. This was a promising sign for the rest of the weekend, especially given his strong cornering performance, not far off from the McLaren.

Effectively, Red Bull positioned itself between Ferrari, which runs a fully low-downforce setup optimized for straight-line speed, and McLaren, which paradoxically achieves maximum efficiency with higher downforce, building time through the fast corners. For qualifying, the Milton Keynes engineers therefore opted for a more extreme solution, never tested until that moment.

The decision was also made possible by the confidence in Verstappen, who has repeatedly shown the ability to manage a very low-downforce car at the rear, even on the limit. Notably, Yuki Tsunoda remained on the standard wing, partly because he does not yet have the latest floor updates.

After qualifying, Helmut Marko praised the team’s work but emphasized that only a driver like Max could execute the plan flawlessly: “It’s a combination of the engineers’ inputs, but in the end only a driving genius like Max can carry it out without mistakes. Max made the difference in the third sector, once again.”

Was the choice to run a lower-downforce wing really decisive? Realistically, yes. It did make high-speed cornering more challenging, but new tyres and the good grip level of the asphalt provided extra traction at the crucial moment. Comparing Verstappen with Yuki Tsunoda, although not entirely comparable, highlights key points: Max had a new engine and the updated floor package, giving him some advantage.

On sections where DRS could be used, Max Verstappen and Yuki Tsunoda were almost identical in acceleration and top speed. Two reasons explain this: once the DRS flap is open, the aerodynamic drag difference is largely nullified; second, more interestingly, differences appear in sections where DRS was not active.

In these areas, particularly before the Variante della Roggia and the Parabolica, Max was 2-3 km/h faster than Yuki Tsunoda at top speed, especially beyond 300 km/h, with a gap of roughly one and a half tenths. While the wing may not be the only factor – the new floor working with DRS closed may also have contributed – the extreme choice made before qualifying had a significant impact.

Even more interesting is the comparison with Lando Norris. During Friday and Saturday morning practice, the top speed difference between McLaren and Red Bull with DRS closed was minimal, despite engine map adjustments. In qualifying, Max found the extra margin that allowed him to gain those crucial hundredths of a second, decisive for pole.

Another factor is the increased difficulty in corners with a lower-downforce wing, which highlights the driver’s skill. Verstappen was masterful at limiting time lost at Ascari and especially through the Parabolica, always one of his strong points. Over the years, the four-time world champion has consistently been highly effective in that section, and he showed the same this weekend, keeping close to a McLaren that had been dominant there all weekend.

This pole is important not only because it allows Max Verstappen to control the race pace but also because Red Bull retained a second set of hard tyres in case of heavy graining or a chaotic race. The low-downforce wing certainly contributed to building the pole lap, but alongside the technical choices, the “Max factor” – his exceptional skill – made the bold gamble a winning one.

Sep 7, 2025John Matthews
F1 2025: Kimi Antonelli returns to Q3 at Monza and targets trouble-free first lapRed Bull’s bold gamble rewards Max Verstappen, but McLaren remain a threat | Italian GP analysis
You Might Also Like
 
Andrea Stella on Lando Norris’ Miami start vs Max Verstappen: “Looking back, he should have held back”
 
Riccardo Patrese believes Aston Martin can only choose between Max Verstappen or Christian Horner

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

1 year ago F1 News, Formula 1 Italian GP, Max Verstappen, Red BullItalian GP, Max Verstappen, Red Bull2

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • George Russell’s painful 2026 F1 season: How bad luck, mistakes and Kimi Antonelli shattered his title dream
  • Honda admits it cannot identify Aston Martin battery failure cause as 2027 F1 concerns grow
  • Max Verstappen reveals 2027 Nürburgring and Spa 24 Hours plans but rules out Le Mans for now
  • Carlos Sainz slams Pirelli’s F1 wet tyres after Brazilian GP aquaplaning problems
  • Ralf Schumacher delivers brutal George Russell verdict with Kimi Antonelli and Barrichello comparison

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}