GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Red Bull challenges FIA engine data as new ADUO investigation is launched in Barcelona

Red Bull challenges FIA engine data as new ADUO investigation is launched in Barcelona. Red Bull seeks review of ADUO results amid surprise engine standings.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull RB22, 2026 F1

The FIA has initiated a fresh review of the ADUO data following concerns raised by Red Bull regarding the results that emerged from the first evaluations based on the opening five races of the season. Although the governing body had already shared the outcome of its analysis with the teams, no official public statement has yet been released.

Within the Barcelona paddock, discussion has intensified around the rankings that reportedly emerged from those assessments and which leaked in recent weeks. The most surprising aspect was the position of the Red Bull power unit at the top of the standings for the internal combustion engine component alone.

The result caught many observers off guard, particularly because Mercedes had widely been regarded by paddock insiders as the benchmark when it came to outright thermal engine performance.

Red Bull questions the findings

Unsurprisingly, the reported leadership position was not welcomed enthusiastically within Red Bull.

While no official comments have been made publicly, information gathered by Motorsport.com suggests that senior figures within the team were both surprised and frustrated to find themselves ranked ahead of Mercedes in the FIA’s assessment.

According to the same report, Red Bull requested a review of the findings and subsequently secured a new examination of the data by the FIA. This additional verification process is believed to be the reason why no official announcement was made immediately after the Monaco Grand Prix, despite earlier expectations that the results would be published at that stage.

The FIA has committed to reassessing the entire process in order to ensure the highest possible level of accuracy in its evaluations.

In reality, FIA technicians had already carried out a second review of the collected data before the latest request arrived. However, in an effort to remove any lingering doubts raised by Red Bull Powertrains, the governing body decided to proceed with yet another verification exercise.

FIA confident the outcome will remain unchanged

Despite the additional checks, there appears to be a strong belief within the FIA that the final conclusions are unlikely to change.

The primary objective of the new review is not necessarily to alter the rankings but rather to ensure complete transparency and eliminate any potential controversy surrounding the process.

Given the significance of the ADUO mechanism and its potential influence on future power unit development opportunities, the FIA is keen to ensure that every manufacturer has confidence in the methodology used to establish the performance rankings.

The new verification process began last Monday and is expected to take approximately ten days to complete.

As things stand, the definitive outcome should be available by the end of next week. The FIA is then expected to communicate the final results through an official statement, bringing clarity to a process that has already generated considerable discussion throughout the Formula 1 paddock.

Jun 11, 2026John Matthews
Aston Martin's biggest problem exposed by Fernando Alonso after Monaco Grand PrixKimi Antonelli determined not to repeat last year’s struggles under pressure
You Might Also Like
 
Mike Krack suggests Adrian Newey’s aero package is part of Aston Martin’s struggle
 
Andrea Stella doubts Mercedes budget claim and expects new W17 upgrades after McLaren surge

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

5 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Spanish GP, Red Bull2026 Formula 1 season, Red Bull, Spanish GP16

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • George Russell’s painful 2026 F1 season: How bad luck, mistakes and Kimi Antonelli shattered his title dream
  • Honda admits it cannot identify Aston Martin battery failure cause as 2027 F1 concerns grow
  • Max Verstappen reveals 2027 Nürburgring and Spa 24 Hours plans but rules out Le Mans for now
  • Carlos Sainz slams Pirelli’s F1 wet tyres after Brazilian GP aquaplaning problems
  • Ralf Schumacher delivers brutal George Russell verdict with Kimi Antonelli and Barrichello comparison

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}