GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Mercedes explains Kimi Antonelli-George Russell team order: “We would have done the same for George”

Mercedes explains Kimi Antonelli-George Russell team order: “We would have done the same for George”

George Russell, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes W17, 2026 F1

Mercedes has insisted that its decision to allow Andrea Kimi Antonelli to reclaim second place from George Russell during the Dutch Grand Prix was based purely on the circumstances of the race rather than any change in the team’s driver hierarchy. Bradley Lord says Mercedes would have made exactly the same call in George Russell’s favour had their positions been reversed.

As Formula 1 heads towards the Italian Grand Prix at Monza, interest is growing around how Mercedes will manage its two drivers after the Zandvoort team order. In theory, both Andrea Kimi Antonelli and George Russell remain in contention for the Drivers’ Championship, making every strategic decision involving the pair increasingly significant.

Mercedes explains Kimi Antonelli-George Russell team order

During the latest episode of the Nu Silver Arrows Radio Show video podcast, Bradley Lord and Andrew Shovlin provided a behind-the-scenes explanation of what happened at Zandvoort. Both made clear that Mercedes would not have hesitated to favour George Russell if the circumstances had been reversed, regardless of the championship standings.

“George, naturally, questioned the instruction when he received it, but he understood the bigger picture,” Bradley Lord explained. “Kimi had taken advantage of the opportunity for a free pit stop during the Virtual Safety Car. If George had done the same, he would have ended up behind a Ferrari and would have lost the podium position.”

Lord explained that Mercedes had already discussed the possibility of its drivers becoming involved in an internal battle before the race.

“Also, in the strategy meeting on Sunday morning, we had been very clear that the group was too tightly packed for our drivers to afford to lose time fighting each other. That discussion provided the basis for the decision. If the circumstances had been reversed, we would have acted in exactly the same way.”

The explanation is intended to make clear that the Zandvoort call was situational rather than an indication that Mercedes has formally designated Andrea Kimi Antonelli as its number one driver.

Monza could put Mercedes’ claim to the test

The Italian Grand Prix could immediately provide Mercedes with an opportunity to demonstrate whether Lord’s claim holds true in the opposite scenario. Andrea Kimi Antonelli is due to serve a grid penalty at Monza because of the new Power Unit that will be fitted to his car, potentially leaving the two Mercedes drivers on very different strategies during the race.

If Andrea Kimi Antonelli were to find himself ahead of George Russell while running an alternative strategy, but risked slowing his team-mate, Mercedes could therefore face the opposite version of its Zandvoort dilemma. The question would then be whether the pit wall would instruct the Italian to move aside and allow George Russell through.

Mercedes considered using Kimi Antonelli to help George Russell

Andrew Shovlin also revealed another interesting detail from the Dutch Grand Prix. Mercedes considered asking Andrea Kimi Antonelli to slow down in order to help George Russell make use of Overtake Mode and defend his podium position more effectively against the Ferraris.

The idea was ultimately rejected because Mercedes believed the potential benefit was not large enough to justify the risk of having its two cars running closely together in a situation the team had not previously tested.

“We discussed it. The gain was around two tenths of a second, mainly on the straight, which was also the most vulnerable area for George,” Andrew Shovlin said. “There was, however, a concern that trying something we had never attempted before could cause contact between the cars.”

“Given that the lap-time gain wasn’t enormous, we decided it was better for Kimi to move further ahead and give George clear space so that he could have the best possible corner exit and braking performance.”

Andrew Shovlin praises George Russell’s Ferrari defence

Mercedes instead left George Russell to defend his podium position on his own, and Andrew Shovlin was impressed by how effectively the Briton managed the situation against both Ferrari cars.

“George’s defence was really impressive. We probably wouldn’t even have given him a 50% chance of keeping both Ferraris behind him; the VSC helped calm the situation down for a couple of laps and allowed him to manage the energy, but he executed the defence superbly,” Andrew Shovlin concluded.

The Zandvoort episode therefore appears to have been driven by race strategy rather than a formal change in status between the Mercedes drivers. With Andrea Kimi Antonelli facing a grid penalty at Monza, however, the Italian Grand Prix could quickly provide a fresh test of the team’s insistence that George Russell would receive exactly the same treatment if circumstances demanded it.

Sep 3, 2026James Carter
Helmut Marko slams F1 ADUO rules after Red Bull is ranked best engineMax Verstappen targets Monza comeback as Ayumu Iwasa takes over Red Bull in FP1
You Might Also Like
 
Carlos Sainz’s top options: Gunther Steiner weighs in on Williams and Aston Martin
 
Lando Norris defends McLaren: “We came back from 150 points down before, we can do it again”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

2 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Dutch GP, Formula 1 Italian GP, George Russell, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season, Andrew Shovlin, Zandvoort6

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • George Russell’s painful 2026 F1 season: How bad luck, mistakes and Kimi Antonelli shattered his title dream
  • Honda admits it cannot identify Aston Martin battery failure cause as 2027 F1 concerns grow
  • Max Verstappen reveals 2027 Nürburgring and Spa 24 Hours plans but rules out Le Mans for now
  • Carlos Sainz slams Pirelli’s F1 wet tyres after Brazilian GP aquaplaning problems
  • Ralf Schumacher delivers brutal George Russell verdict with Kimi Antonelli and Barrichello comparison

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}