GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » McLaren RB21 vs Red Bull MCL39: is the battle about ride heights? Not exactly…

McLaren RB21 vs Red Bull MCL39: is the battle about ride heights? Not exactly…. McLaren and Red Bull are locked in a tight F1 title fight.

McLaren MCL39, 2025 F1 car

McLaren, Red Bull and the topic of ride heights: the two Formula 1 teams are currently fighting for the drivers’ title. On one side there’s Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri, and on the other, the dominant Max Verstappen. It’s a challenge influenced by many factors – track adaptation, execution, tyre management, driver talent, and especially the car setup regarding ride height. And it’s precisely on this aspect that Andrea Stella identifies a possible key factor currently benefiting the Austrian team.

Ride heights on the MCL39

Andrea Stella, the Italian engineer and former Ferrari member, has offered a rather interesting technical analysis. According to him, when comparing the McLaren MCL39 and the Red Bull RB21, the main factor that differentiates the two cars in their fight lies in how they manage ride heights. This is a crucial element because the closer the floor of the car is to the reference plane, the more efficient the Venturi channels become. That much is clear.

Essentially, the goal is to lower the car as much as possible towards the ground to generate a strong amount of downforce. It’s a “clean” vertical load, as it doesn’t create the drag produced by the wings through their angle of incidence. However, within this reasoning, one fundamental element cannot be overlooked: the wear of the plank located beneath the floor.

One of McLaren’s weapons this season, based on what has been observed, is its ability to run the car low while consuming less of this component compared to rivals. Moreover, there’s an interesting detail worth considering. Some suggest that, due to the intrinsic dynamics of the British car, the MCL39 tends to scrape the floor more in the front section.

The complications of managing ride height

This is a theory still to be proven, and it partly contradicts the car’s excellent front end and its frequent ability to make the difference during corner entry phases. To this, one must also add that Ferrari has been accused of facing a similar problem. In fact, in several races, the Maranello car showed weak corner entry compared to other top teams. In any case, we’re talking about a very complex subject.

We’re still in the realm of hypotheses. On the other hand, it’s true that having more localized plank wear towards the front could, in general, allow the use of a lower ride height – with the resulting aerodynamic load benefits. It’s also important to remember that, when it comes to ride heights, suspension stiffness is a decisive factor to prevent excessive pressure on areas of the floor that tend to scrape the track.

But suspension stiffness also affects other aspects of vehicle dynamics. For example, a stiffer front end provides better control during turn-in, offering greater precision and improved direction changes. However, at the same time, it increases the tendency toward understeer. As we can see, it’s always a matter of compromise.

Red Bull, for its part, has modified the RB21 over the last few races. The team did so mainly by working on two specific parts of the car. The first concerns the front wing, which now offers a wider range of adjustments and helps control the rotation deficit that limited Max Verstappen’s performance earlier in the season. The second revised component is the floor, with reshaped areas to improve its aerodynamic efficiency.

Does the RB21 use the floor better than the MCL39? Hard to say…

According to Fernando Alonso’s former race engineer, since the Italian Grand Prix in Monza, the former world champion team has learned how to address all these aspects effectively, consistently achieving the best aero-mechanical compromise possible. Beyond circuit-specific traits, achieving a perfect weekend execution means optimizing every technical aspect of the car.

And it’s precisely here, thanks also to the exceptional talent of Max Verstappen and the approach of Laurent Mekies in applying driver feedback, that the Austrian team has made significant progress, providing the RB21 with more consistent performance. On the other hand, McLaren’s “regression” can be seen as a combination of various factors that the reigning world champions have struggled to manage effectively.

Referring to the Milton Keynes-based squad, Andrea Stella jokingly bets a symbolic coffee on the RB21’s ride height management, believing it will be a decisive factor in the remaining five rounds of the 2025 championship. Although there is much truth in the words of the team principal from Orvieto, it must also be said that McLaren, at least in the last three Grands Prix, has failed to optimize its qualifying performance. Had it succeeded, it might have won at least two races.

Verstappen, Red Bull and tyre management

There’s also the topic of tyre degradation, on which the team now led by Laurent Mekies has done an excellent job. They’ve been helped, to some extent, by circuits where tyre wear turned out to be less severe than initially expected. Even Pirelli confirmed this. Therefore, we’re looking at a combination of factors in which ride height certainly plays an important role, but it’s far from being the only decisive element.

Oct 22, 2025Sophie Bennett
Oscar Piastri faces pressure: 40 points lead and the mental challenge of a first F1 championshipOscar Piastri’s calm experience could define McLaren’s F1 title hopes
You Might Also Like
 
Pierre Wache confirms: “Red Bull will fight for the 2025 F1 title”
 
Max Verstappen’s exit clause: Could the champion leave Red Bull at the end of 2026 F1?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Sophie Bennett

Sophie Bennett combines a deep knowledge of Formula 1 with an approachable writing style. Whether it’s breaking news, driver interviews, or race recaps, Sophie delivers the F1 updates you can’t miss

11 months ago F1 News, McLaren, Red Bull2025 Formula 1 season, Andrea Stella, McLaren, Red Bull4

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}