GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » Juan Pablo Montoya suggests 20% energy cut to improve F1 but warns of unintended consequences

Juan Pablo Montoya suggests 20% energy cut to improve F1 but warns of unintended consequences. Juan Pablo Montoya shares his view on how reducing energy deployment in F1 could improve safety and racing.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull RB22, 2026 F1

Advice for the FIA

Juan Pablo Montoya is undoubtedly one of the drivers who best embodies the no-frills Formula 1 of the early 2000s. Yet, the former Williams and McLaren driver has not hidden a certain appreciation for the new regulations that have sparked so much debate among fans and current drivers. In an interview given to the Casinostugan portal, the Colombian explained how, in fact, some adjustments to energy management could benefit the on-track spectacle, provided that the FIA is careful not to overdo it and risk recreating the dull “DRS trains” that were often seen with the previous generation of cars.

F1, Juan Pablo Montoya’s opinion

“I don’t think that in five weeks,” Juancho explained, “they will be able to fix something they have been working on for the last four years. The only possible solution, if this is a safety issue, is to limit the amount of energy distributed across the various sectors. At that point, the rules would be the same for everyone. If they want to make changes, they could remove some power to slightly extend battery life and reduce lift and coast. If they took away around 20% of the electric motor’s power, you could use more energy for overtaking mode, and that might not be a bad idea. If the amount of energy and how it is used on other straights were limited, then the safety issue linked to speed differences would disappear. But there needs to be uniformity.”

“The reality is,” he added, “that right now every team deploys power in a different way and believes theirs is the best approach. Look at Ferrari in the first sector at Suzuka and how incredibly fast they were, and the same in the middle sector, but then in the third it seemed that Mercedes had done a much better job because they were not draining the battery too much at the start of the lap. This makes a huge difference at the end. So, if you define where energy can be deployed and how much can be used in each sector, then you force drivers into a more conventional race.”

Watch out for the drawbacks

Juan Pablo Montoya, however, warns Formula 1 about the risk of overreacting in a way that could ultimately prove harmful: “If the FIA solves the safety problem, we could see the return of DRS trains and end up with races without overtaking. And then people will complain that F1 is boring. The truth is there is no perfect answer, because they moved away from last year’s rules as they were considered inadequate, with teams and drivers complaining about how terrible ground effect was, how difficult it was to follow the car ahead, and the amount of porpoising. And now what? Everyone says we should go back? That’s the issue — too many voices are being listened to.”

“We need to be very careful. They could end up shooting themselves in the foot while trying to make Formula 1 races safer for the drivers,” Juan Pablo Montoya concluded.

Apr 16, 2026James Carter
Johnny Herbert suggests Max Verstappen could join McLaren WEC program in 2027Nico Rosberg hails Kimi Antonelli as F1’s ultimate outsider after stunning start
You Might Also Like
 
Max Verstappen claims number 3 with a laugh: “Just a couple of drinks and it’s mine”
 
Jos Verstappen dismisses Max Verstappen Red Bull contract rumours

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

5 months ago F1 News2026 Formula 1 season, Juan Pablo Montoya6

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}