GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » How Mercedes fixed its F1 launch weakness with Kimi Antonelli clutch changes in Canada

How Mercedes fixed its F1 launch weakness with Kimi Antonelli clutch changes in Canada. Why Mercedes changed Andrea Kimi Antonelli’s clutch setup to improve race starts.

Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes W17, 2026 F1

Mercedes has spent time addressing one of the few weaknesses that had emerged during the early stages of the 2026 Formula 1 season: race starts. Alongside software interventions, the Silver Arrows also introduced ergonomic changes to Andrea Kimi Antonelli’s clutch lever in a bid to improve consistency and driver feel.

One of Mercedes’ few weak points

Mercedes had shown very few obvious weaknesses at the start of the season, but launch performance was certainly one of them. On several occasions — particularly with Andrea Kimi Antonelli — the team lost positions as soon as the lights went out, to the point that before the Canadian Grand Prix, Mercedes had never managed to lead at the end of the opening lap despite securing every pole position.

It was clearly an issue that needed solving. Starting from the front only to be swallowed by the pack within a few hundred metres was far from the ideal way to shape a Grand Prix. The size of the turbo played a role, but it was not the only factor. McLaren, despite using the same power unit, had repeatedly demonstrated far stronger launches.

The Woking-based team, for example, designs its gearbox in-house and has opted for relatively short gear ratios, a different philosophy compared to Mercedes. As team principal Andrea Stella has also confirmed, that approach offers an advantage off the line, even if it is not the sole explanation. On average, however, McLaren had clearly been outperforming Mercedes in launch execution.

The real issue was consistency

The biggest concern was inconsistency. Mercedes was not simply lacking explosive starts — it was also struggling with unpredictable launch performance. In some races, the damage was limited to losing a single position, while in others the drop through the field was far more severe.

This had already been visible during pre-season testing in Bahrain, where producing a clean launch often took multiple attempts. That inconsistency particularly affected Andrea Kimi Antonelli, who frequently found himself slipping backwards during the opening phase of races.

However, not every poor start was the Italian driver’s fault. In Australia, for instance, Andrea Kimi Antonelli arrived on the grid without sufficient battery energy due to a calculation error by the team, preventing him from completing proper burnouts to warm the rear tyres. With the battery partially depleted, acceleration after clutch release was inevitably compromised as well.

In China, there was a misunderstanding with his race engineer over the launch mapping settings, while in Miami the issue stemmed from incorrect grip estimates. Mercedes had expected significantly higher grip levels from his grid slot, meaning the launch parameters — from torque delivery to clutch release timing and modulation — were based on overly optimistic assumptions, triggering a chain reaction of problems.

Software changes and a clutch redesign

At Suzuka, however, the responsibility lay more with the driver, as Andrea Kimi Antonelli released the clutch too aggressively. It is an extremely sensitive component, where even a few degrees of movement can make a decisive difference. That is why Mercedes approached the issue on two fronts. First, the team worked on the software, as it was clear there were system-level weaknesses that needed to be addressed.

At the same time, Andrea Kimi Antonelli opted for ergonomic modifications to his clutch lever to improve feel during release. The lever itself was not fundamentally redesigned — it remains the familiar single-paddle setup used for years — but Mercedes adjusted the finger housing area, making small positional changes to allow finer control during the clutch bite phase.

“We have a new clutch lever on my side to help me be a bit more consistent with the clutch release,” Andrea Kimi Antonelli explained – “Obviously, the team has worked a lot on the software side and on the clutch itself, trying both to find more performance and to make the system a bit more robust.”

Andrea Kimi Antonelli then tested the solutions during practice, with the updates remaining in place for the rest of the weekend.

Signs of progress in Canada

The finger housing is tailored to each individual driver, who must find the right sensitivity at the clutch bite point. In Canada, Mercedes appeared to make genuine progress.

In the Sprint, George Russell produced an outstanding launch — arguably the best among the front-runners. In the Grand Prix itself, evaluating performance became more difficult due to the three separate starts and the slippery conditions created by light drizzle, but overall, Mercedes’ getaway performance could no longer be considered a major weakness.

May 27, 2026James Carter
F1 Canada: The clever Mercedes brake-to-rim heating secret that dominated Montreal temperaturesInside George Russell’s mental battle as Mercedes leadership demands immediate success
You Might Also Like
 
Andrea Stella hails “best ever” Oscar Piastri after podium heroics in Japan
 
Nigel Mansell defends Max Verstappen and criticises F1 regulations: “He is right”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

James Carter

James Carter brings sharp analysis and a love for all things F1 to the forefront. From strategy breakdowns to driver insights, James's articles keep fans informed and engaged with the ever-evolving world of Formula 1.

4 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Canadian GP, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season, Canadian GP, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes9

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}