GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » F1 mystery solved: Mercedes “bi-phase” front wing doesn’t exist

F1 mystery solved: Mercedes “bi-phase” front wing doesn’t exist. Mercedes has clarified that there is no “bi-phase” front wing. .

Mercedes W17 front wing, 2026 F1

Mercedes engineers in Brackley have confirmed that the alleged “bi-phase” front wing was never intentional. The unusual behavior observed during the Chinese Grand Prix was caused by a hydraulic pressure miscalculation affecting the activation of the movable flap system, with no attempt to circumvent the regulations. The case has therefore been clarified, explaining why no investigation was opened by the governing body.

Hydraulic problem caused the flap anomaly

The mystery was resolved with a simple explanation: the Mercedes front wing is not “bi-phase.” In China, the system experienced abnormal operation due to a hydraulic issue. Apparently, there was no attempt to break the rules, but rather difficulty closing the two movable flaps within the prescribed 400 milliseconds. This was ultimately defined as a miscalculation of the hydraulic pressure settings when the car exceeded a certain speed.

Videos sparked online speculation

After the Shanghai race, videos circulated online showing that the flap closing time was roughly double what the regulations require. Between the second race of the season and the Japanese Grand Prix, Mercedes engineers intervened on Kimi Antonelli’s W17 to resolve the issue. The FIA accepted the explanations provided by the Brackley team, acknowledging the team’s good faith.

No FIA investigation required

This clarifies why the governing body never opened an investigation against the team leading the championship. Initial reports suggested that Ferrari had alerted the FIA, but the Italian team denied any involvement.

The delayed flap closure was a disadvantage, not an advantage

The final note on the matter is crucial: the delayed closure of the movable front wing flaps was not a performance advantage. On the contrary, it created a problem because it compromised the car’s aerodynamic balance prior to braking, resulting in a loss of performance rather than a gain.

The Mercedes front wing saga ends not with a disqualification, but with a technical correction. Based on the content of the team’s report to the FIA, the W17’s “stuttering” wing was a hindrance that should now be a thing of the past as the field takes to the track in Japan.

Mar 26, 2026Daniel Novak
From Shanghai to Suzuka: Kimi Antonelli warns against "hero to zero" trap after maiden F1 winCadillac F1 brings Suzuka upgrades: New diffuser fences and reinforced mirrors for the MAC-26
You Might Also Like
 
Aston Martin prepares for 2026 F1 season with a powerful secret weapon
 
Mattia Binotto: Audi already has a top-four chassis, but engine progress will take time

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Daniel Novak

Daniel Novak is a seasoned F1 reporter with a passion for precision and storytelling. His coverage spans everything from race weekends to team politics, giving fans an all-access pass to the action on and off the track

6 months ago F1 News, Formula 1 Chinese GP, Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes2026 Formula 1 season, Chinese GP, Mercedes6

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}