
Formula 1 is preparing for a potential financial shake-up, with Mercedes reportedly in negotiations to acquire a 24% stake in Alpine. The share, currently held by the Otro Capital consortium, would represent a strategically significant entry for the Stuttgart-based manufacturer. This move would not involve Toto Wolff as a private individual, but rather the German parent company itself. The project aims to strengthen a crucial technical and political alliance ahead of the upcoming regulatory challenges.
Wolff’s move to counter Horner
The deal has reignited the long-standing rivalry between Mercedes leadership and Christian Horner, the former historic figure of Red Bull. The British manager, following his forced departure from the Milton Keynes team, is seeking a return to the F1 paddock in a position of influence. Supported by the experience of Bernie Ecclestone, Christian sees Alpine as the ideal platform to regain political relevance within the sport.
Mercedes’ move is also being interpreted as an attempt to block the path of its long-time and fiercest rival. From a strategic perspective, entering the Enstone-based team’s capital would strengthen Mercedes’ position as a key supplier of hybrid power units. Becoming a shareholder in the French outfit would grant Brackley greater control over both the technical and political dynamics of its customer team.
This operation clearly reflects the intention to create a complete synergy between the two European production hubs. Regarding corporate philosophy, Toto Wolff has made his stance clear on shareholding structures and team independence. The Austrian executive recalled his previous experience with Williams, emphasizing that he would never tolerate external interference in crucial decision-making processes.
According to Wolff’s vision, Mercedes has no interest in owning or managing a junior team in the near competitive future. For him, the matter is closed, confirming that the Silver Star’s project does not include the creation of satellite teams. This is purely about political influence.
Alpine confirms interest from Mercedes
The issue of multi-team ownership remains a hot topic in the paddock, fueling debates about the legitimacy of such cross-ownership structures. However, Wolff clarified that Mercedes has no intention of following the model adopted by other teams that already operate secondary outfits.
The distinction between Mercedes as a company and Wolff as an individual is key to navigating the complexities of current regulations. The operation is aimed exclusively at establishing a high-level commercial and technical partnership, without compromising Alpine’s French identity.
Flavio Briatore, current CEO and team principal of Alpine, officially confirmed that the ongoing negotiations involve the Mercedes group and no one else. The Italian manager stressed that the discussions do not include Toto Wolff personally, but are strictly conducted at a corporate level with clearly defined parameters.
Alpine and the future balance of Formula 1
There are reportedly other potential buyers interested in the 24% stake currently held by the American investment fund Otro Capital, which brings together several prominent figures from the world of sport. The situation remains dynamic and subject to continuous developments, within a financial market that is constantly evolving. Alpine itself is not the selling party, as the shares are entirely owned by Otro Capital.
The French team’s CEO is simply monitoring the situation without directly engaging in negotiations with potential buyers. The team’s position remains that of an interested observer, hoping for a positive outcome that ensures long-term stability.
The sale of the share package to new investors would be welcomed very positively by the leadership of the Enstone-based outfit. The future ownership structure of Alpine could mark a turning point in the political balance of modern Formula 1. This is something that always attracts strong interest in the top tier of motorsport—especially from a manufacturer like Mercedes.



Leave a Reply