GP-News.net

  • F1 News
  • F1 races
    • Formula 1 Australian GP
    • Formula 1 Chinese GP
    • Formula 1 Japanese GP
    • Formula 1 Bahrain GP
    • Formula 1 Saudi Arabian GP
  • F1 teams
    • McLaren
    • Red Bull
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes
    • Aston Martin
    • Alpine
    • Audi
    • Haas
    • RB
    • Williams
    • Cadillac
  • F1 drivers
    • Arvid Lindblad
    • Max Verstappen
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • George Russell
    • Lando Norris
    • Oscar Piastri
    • Charles Leclerc
    • Carlos Sainz
    • Sergio Perez
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Lance Stroll
    • Alex Albon
    • Franco Colapinto
    • Nico Hulkenberg
    • Esteban Ocon
    • Pierre Gasly
    • Valtteri Bottas
    • Zhou Guanyu
    • Oliver Bearman
    • Kimi Antonelli
    • Gabriel Bortoleto
    • Isack Hadjar
  • F1 legends
    • Ayrton Senna
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Alain Prost
    • Niki Lauda
    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Jackie Stewart
  • F1 interviews
  • F1 videos
  • F1 history
  • Advertise
  • F1 store
  • Home
  • Formula 1 results and calendar
  • Formula 1 Driver Standings
  • Formula 1 Constructor Standings
Home » “Empty cans make the most noise”: Red Bull hits back at Mercedes 2026 engine rumors

“Empty cans make the most noise”: Red Bull hits back at Mercedes 2026 engine rumors. Red Bull casts doubt on Mercedes’ advantage ahead of the 2026 season.

George Russell, Mercedes W16, 2025 F1

Already, a war of words has broken out between Red Bull and Mercedes over the 2026 season. The Austrian team believes that the situation in Brackley is far from ideal.

On the eve of the tests that will reveal where all the teams stand at the start of the new 2026 regulations, accusations between the top teams have already begun. Specifically, Red Bull is convinced that Mercedes itself has been fueling the narrative suggesting it will be the favourite for the new season.

The 2014 precedent and new rumours

Comparisons with the past are unavoidable. In 2014, with the introduction of turbo-hybrid engines, Mercedes built an enormous technical advantage, dominating the early years of the new regulations.

Now, once again, some voices in the paddock suggest that the Silver Arrows may have repeated that success, exploiting a supposed grey area related to the engine’s compression ratio. According to these rumours, Mercedes could arrive at the first Barcelona tests as the new benchmark.

Red Bull itself was thought to have exploited this grey area, though the team later denied it. However, the Milton Keynes squad has not remained silent and has offered its own interpretation of the rumours surrounding their rivals.

Hodgkinson calms the storm: “Rumours started by Mercedes”

Ben Hodgkinson, technical director of Red Bull Powertrains and a former key figure at Mercedes, took a clear stance. Ben Hodgkinson worked at Mercedes for over twenty years before leaving in 2022.

According to him, many of the rumours circulating in recent weeks originated within Mercedes itself. “I believe a lot of this chatter started with Mercedes themselves. As my grandmother used to say: it’s the empty cans that make the most noise,” he told The Express.

The British engineer also suggested these rumours should be read strategically. “There’s a lot of talk that Mercedes will become the benchmark.

“Many of these stories started with them, probably because the driver market is very tough and they wanted to attract people with a car that at the time was not competitive. If a rumour is repeated long enough, people end up believing it and start looking for explanations.”

Ben Hodgkinson then downplayed the hype, emphasizing that the true comparison will be on track. “Mercedes is a very strong engine manufacturer. I worked there for 20 years, so I know it very well. I just want to focus and move forward. In the end, it will be the results on track that speak,” he concluded.

The verbal sparring between Ben Hodgkinson and his former employers at Mercedes Highlights the high stakes of the 2026 engine transition. By dismissing Mercedes’ rumored technical breakthrough as a “marketing ploy” designed to stabilize their driver lineup and recruitment, Red Bull is attempting to shift the pressure back onto Brackley. As we approach the Barcelona tests, the focus remains on whether the “empty can” analogy holds water or if Mercedes has truly found a silver bullet in the compression ratio regulations that will define the next decade of Formula 1.

Jan 19, 2026John Matthews
Ex-Red Bull advisor Helmut Marko opens up on his future outside Formula 1Yuki Tsunoda "forgotten" by F1: Juan Pablo Montoya’s brutal reality check
You Might Also Like
 
Nico Hulkenberg on 2026 F1: embracing change and challenging the young drivers
 
Juan Pablo Montoya urges Red Bull to ban Max Verstappen from Nordschleife racing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

John Matthews

John Matthews is a seasoned motorsport journalist with over a decade of experience covering Formula 1

8 months ago F1 News, Mercedes, Red Bull2026 Formula 1 season, Mercedes, Red Bull4

Ferrari F1 latest news and updates

Recent Posts

  • Zak Brown cools McLaren F1 engine plans as Mercedes remains priority beyond 2030
  • Why Fernando Alonso is staying in F1 at 46 as Aston Martin’s Newey-Honda project reaches 2027
  • Leonardo Fornaroli risks missing 2027 F1 seat as Rafael Camara leads Haas race
  • Racing Bulls development surge fuels bid for best-ever fifth in F1 standings
  • Max Verstappen turns 29 with four F1 titles and 71 victories already secured

Mercedes F1 news

Partners

ScuderiaFans - Ferrari news and updates

Thailand Walking Street

Contact us

About us

Our writers

Privacy Policy

Advertise with us

Terms and Conditions

© 2024 GP-News Ltd. All Rights Reserved
GP-News Ltd, 199 Republicii Street, 5A
Ploiesti, Romania, 100392

@ Copyright 2024 GP-News.net | All Right Reserved
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}